Dieter Maurer wrote:
from BTrees.IOBTree import IOBucket
would be the new equivalent to the old IOBTree.Bucket.
Thanks, I'm currently working up some unit tests for the caching code
and I'll switch this in once I've got some failing tests.
It's a shame no-one has replied to my other
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
Chris,
Do you feel like blessing the current installer for upload to zope.org?
Sure, I'll whack them up there some time soon :-)
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote:
-obj = self.aq_parent.unrestrictedTraverse(self.getpath(rid))
-if not obj:
+obj = self.aq_parent.unrestrictedTraverse(self.getpath(rid), None)
+if obj is None:
Please revert this change. You've changed the semantics of this
Tino Wildenhain wrote:
I have a replacement started, which uses Cacheable mixin instead.
Advantage is, with RAM Cache Manager you can see the hits your method
cause and invalide the cache per object. I also introduced a execution
time treshold, so you can configure to only cache runtimes say
Chris Withers schrieb:
Tino Wildenhain wrote:
I have a replacement started, which uses Cacheable mixin instead.
Advantage is, with RAM Cache Manager you can see the hits your method
cause and invalide the cache per object. I also introduced a execution
time treshold, so you can configure to
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Thu Nov 16 12:00:00 2006 UTC to Fri Nov 17 12:00:00 2006 UTC.
There were 9 messages: 9 from Zope Unit Tests.
Test failures
-
Subject: FAILED (failures=2) : Zope-2.8 Python-2.4.4 : Linux
From: Zope Unit Tests
Date: Thu Nov 16
Chris Withers schrieb:
Tino Wildenhain wrote:
I have a replacement started, which uses Cacheable mixin instead.
Advantage is, with RAM Cache Manager you can see the hits your method
cause and invalide the cache per object. I also introduced a execution
time treshold, so you can configure to
Em Sex, 2006-11-17 às 07:48 +, Chris Withers escreveu:
Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote:
[]
This is the full method before my changes:
def getobject(self, rid, REQUEST=None):
Return a cataloged object given a 'data_record_id_'
obj =
I am planning to release 2.10.1 and 2.9.6 early next week (likely on TUE).
Cheers,
Andrfeas
pgpk6KYrMGVxe.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or
Andreas Jung wrote:
I am planning to release 2.10.1 and 2.9.6 early next week (likely on TUE).
I'll hopefully be checking in today, but please can you wait until I've
checked in a fix for #2212?
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope Python Consulting
-
--On 17. November 2006 16:05:02 + Chris Withers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
I am planning to release 2.10.1 and 2.9.6 early next week (likely on
TUE).
I'll hopefully be checking in today, but please can you wait until I've
checked in a fix for #2212?
Go, go, go
Hey folks,
I am planning to release 2.10.1 and 2.9.6 early next week (likely on TUE).
anyone with 5 minutes available to bless my fix for #2191? :-)
http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/2191
--
___
Dorneles Treméa ·
Andreas Jung wrote:
I'll hopefully be checking in today, but please can you wait until I've
checked in a fix for #2212?
Go, go, go :-)
Your wish is my command :-P
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
Chris Withers wrote:
I have to be honest, I'm looking to simplify, and this sounds a LOT more
complicated...
Okay, I've written unit tests and refactored the code on the 2.9 branch,
2.10 branch and trunk.
Please let me know if you have any problems...
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix -
Chris Withers wrote at 2006-11-16 17:29 +:
I'm wondering if you can still remember the rational behind the cache
code at around lines 355-387 of:
http://svn.zope.org/Zope/trunk/lib/python/Shared/DC/ZRDB/DA.py?rev=68158view=auto
This code is pretty old (checked in 5th Dec 1997) but has
Chris Withers schrieb:
Chris Withers wrote:
I have to be honest, I'm looking to simplify, and this sounds a LOT
more complicated...
Okay, I've written unit tests and refactored the code on the 2.9 branch,
2.10 branch and trunk.
Please let me know if you have any problems...
Uh oh -
Em Sex, 2006-11-17 às 14:20 -0200, Dorneles Treméa escreveu:
Hey folks,
I am planning to release 2.10.1 and 2.9.6 early next week (likely on TUE).
anyone with 5 minutes available to bless my fix for #2191? :-)
http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/2191
Looks good enough for me.
--
Lennart Regebro wrote:
And funnily enough, I'm not in there, although Florent is, and our
papers should have been faxed in at the same time.
You were in the list of members on the old site.
Sathya,
How is the membership list on the new site created?
Is there something I can update
18 matches
Mail list logo
