Martin Aspeli wrote:
Plone development with Archetypes is not painful. Hundreds of developers
do it, so it can't be that bad.
Urm, that's not true. Archetypes is the single most painful component to
use from Plone...
It's also the biggest source of frustration I have with Plone.
Chris
--
Chris Withers wrote:
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Plone development with Archetypes is not painful. Hundreds of developers
do it, so it can't be that bad.
Urm, that's not true. Archetypes is the single most painful component to
use from Plone...
It's also the biggest source of
--On 23. April 2007 03:57:25 -0700 Martin Aspeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Withers wrote:
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Plone development with Archetypes is not painful. Hundreds of
developers do it, so it can't be that bad.
Urm, that's not true. Archetypes is the single most painful
Andreas Jung-5 wrote:
Okay. Let me rephrase. Most people don't find it painful, and a huge
number of developers are being very productive with Archetypes. I know
you hate it Chris, but you are in the minority.
I have to second that. The latest versions of AT are pretty much stable
and
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Sun Apr 22 12:00:00 2007 UTC to Mon Apr 23 12:00:00 2007 UTC.
There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Unit Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.7 Python-2.3.6 : Linux
From: Zope Unit Tests
Date: Sun Apr 22 20:51:30 EDT 2007
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Chris Withers wrote:
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Plone development with Archetypes is not painful. Hundreds of developers
do it, so it can't be that bad.
AT has the classic Z-shaped curve in spades: when it does what you
want,
Tres Seaver wrote:
AT has the classic Z-shaped curve in spades: when it does what you
want, it is great, but trying to get it to do something else is painful
and frustrating.
I don't agree all that often with Chris W, but I find Archetypes an
extremely frustrating framework to work
