Hi,
a) the wiki is down. Can someone please fix this?
b) the homepage of zope.interface 3.0.0b1 points to the wiki. I changed
this so that c) gets fixed for now.
This probably results in 3.0.0b1 becoming uninstallable right now,
although I doubt that it was installable (through the wiki)
On Aug 11, 2008, at 10:07 , Christian Theune wrote:
a) the wiki is down. Can someone please fix this?
Well, it wasn't down like it always was on the old server, Apache just
served an empty page for it. This appears to have been a (unrelated)
Apache configuration. It's fixed now.
jens
Christophe Combelles wrote:
Is this change ok?
It seems to solve the previous failures in the 3.4 kgs, and speeds up
the test.
I don't have a problem with the change, but this damages the usefulness
of README.txt as documentation.
As someone who's never used zope3recipes, I'm going to read
Aaron Lehmann wrote:
If the buildout is nailed to that version or above, and there is none,
it breaks.
Well, breaks is good, but hopefully that means gives an error message
along the lines of '''you specified version 'x.y.z' which could not be
found'''. Is that what happens or do you just
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Sun Aug 10 11:00:00 2008 UTC to Mon Aug 11 11:00:00 2008 UTC.
There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Sun Aug 10 20:52:30 EDT 2008
URL:
On Monday 11 August 2008, Christian Theune wrote:
c) buildout/setuptools crashes on the opportunity that urllib raises a
BadStatusLine exception instead of checking the next possibility. This
is inside of setuptools though.
Thanks for debugging. :-) That was my first task this morning. ;-)
On Aug 11, 2008, at 5:17 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
Christophe Combelles wrote:
Is this change ok?
It seems to solve the previous failures in the 3.4 kgs, and speeds
up the test.
I don't have a problem with the change, but this damages the
usefulness of README.txt as documentation.
As
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 11, 2008, at 5:17 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
Christophe Combelles wrote:
Is this change ok?
It seems to solve the previous failures in the 3.4 kgs, and speeds
up the test.
I don't have a problem with the change, but
