Re: [Zope-dev] trying out the buildout-based Zope 2.12...

2009-03-28 Thread Yoshinori Okuji
On Saturday 28 March 2009 06:11:30 Chris Withers wrote: Andreas Jung wrote: Stop with your approach right now until we have understood what's going wrong. Working with a SVN checkout from the trunk works (as said). I'm interested in actually solving what's wrong ;-) This feels like

[Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 4 OK, 2 Unknown

2009-03-28 Thread Zope Tests Summarizer
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Fri Mar 27 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Sat Mar 28 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Tests. Unknown --- Subject: UNKNOWN : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Fri Mar 27 21:15:55 EDT 2009 URL:

Re: [Zope-dev] trying out the buildout-based Zope 2.12...

2009-03-28 Thread Andreas Jung
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 27.03.2009 15:47 Uhr, Chris Withers wrote: Hey All, I'm trying to get Zope 2.12 working with buildout, in the absence of docs, I thought I'd try: [buildout] parts = zopetest [zopetest] recipe = zc.recipe.egg interpreter = py eggs =

Re: [Zope-dev] trying out the buildout-based Zope 2.12...

2009-03-28 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Chris Withers wrote: Paul Winkler wrote: Well, yeah. The point of the suggestion was specifically to help you get more info about the dependency chain, since pip is more verbose about that than easy_install is. Well, running buildout -v gives some good clues, a piece of

[Zope-dev] setuptools dependency for zope.interface (was Re: [Checkins] SVN: zope.interface/trunk/src/zope/__init__.py 'setuptools' is not a dependency, reverting r97875)

2009-03-28 Thread Baiju M
Hi, I am sorry, I made a mistake in the beginning of this month by removing the fall-back import of 'pkgutil' from zope.interface And this is made into 3.5.1 release, so it will a break for those who don't have 'setuptools' installed. I have reverted that change now. Can anyone give me access