* Tres Seaver [2009-06-30 20:41]:
> Jim Fulton wrote:
>> I should know this, but I don't. What is the recommended way to test
>> changes to core ZTK packages to mitigate the risk that changes affect
>> other packages? Is there a page somewhere with instructions?
>>
>> I tried using using zop
On Tuesday 30 June 2009, Jim Fulton wrote:
> > And here it is.
>
> OK, this sorta looks like what I got with Python 2.4. It probably
> would have been good enough to say "yeah, I get lots of errors too." :)
Sorry! ;-)
> So basically, this is how we're supposed to run tests and we're in
> bad
On Jun 30, 2009, at 4:51 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Jim Fulton wrote:
>
>> I'm not familiar with the static-deps option. To what? Its setup.py?
>
> $ wget http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/l/lxml/lxml-2.2.2.tar.gz
> ...
> $ tar xzf lxml-2.2.2
On Jun 30, 2009, at 1:04 PM, Stephan Richter wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 June 2009, Stephan Richter wrote:
>> I'll report the full output when it is done.
>
> And here it is.
OK, this sorta looks like what I got with Python 2.4. It probably
would have been good enough to say "yeah, I get lots of
Hi Paul
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: zope-dev-boun...@zope.org
> [mailto:zope-dev-boun...@zope.org] Im Auftrag von Paul Carduner
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 30. Juni 2009 21:18
> An: zope-dev
> Betreff: [Zope-dev] Making PersistentList satisfy zope.schema.List
>
> I noticed that Pers
On Jun 30, 2009, at 1:03 PM, Stephan Richter wrote:
...
> I am running the tests as I am writing this. So far I got one failure:
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/opt/zope/packages/eggs/z3c.macro-1.2.1-py2.5.egg/z3c/macro/
> tests.py",
> line 29, in
>import z3c.pt
> ImportErro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
> I'm not familiar with the static-deps option. To what? Its setup.py?
$ wget http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/l/lxml/lxml-2.2.2.tar.gz
...
$ tar xzf lxml-2.2.2.tar.gz
$ cd lxml-2.2.2
$ /path/to/python setup.py bdist_egg
On Jun 30, 2009, at 2:35 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Tim Hoffman wrote:
>> I have to chime in here too
>>
>> lxml is a real pain and seems to be problematic to get a
>> straightforward
>> build for packages other than ZTK as well. I have had var
I noticed that PersistentList and PersistentDict do not satisfy
zope.schema.List or zope.schema.Dict, which is rather annoying. For
example:
class IBlogPost(Interface):
tags = zope.schema.List(title=u'Tags', value_type=zope.schema.TextLine)
class BlogPost(Persistent):
implements(IBlogPos
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
> I should know this, but I don't. What is the recommended way to test
> changes to core ZTK packages to mitigate the risk that changes affect
> other packages? Is there a page somewhere with instructions?
>
> I tried using usin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tim Hoffman wrote:
> I have to chime in here too
>
> lxml is a real pain and seems to be problematic to get a straightforward
> build for packages other than ZTK as well. I have had varying success
> building lxml even under ubuntu - success seems to
Can't use lxml on google app engine either.
I use ElementTree. If only the lxml extensions to the etree API were
available in ElementTree, especially the ability to pretty print the
xml and do xpath queries, that would be great.
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
>
> On Jun 30, 2
On Tuesday 30 June 2009, Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Jun 30, 2009, at 1:03 PM, Stephan Richter wrote:
> ...
>
> > 2. Run python bootstrap.py
>
> Which Python? 2.4, 2.5, 2.6? All of the above?
I have mainly run test under 2.5. I am fine if people run those tests after
changes in any Python version. ;-)
On Jun 30, 2009, at 1:03 PM, Stephan Richter wrote:
...
> 2. Run python bootstrap.py
Which Python? 2.4, 2.5, 2.6? All of the above?
Jim
--
Jim Fulton
Zope Corporation
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/
On Jun 30, 2009, at 1:03 PM, Stephan Richter wrote:
> I consider
> lxml pretty much the standard tool to do XML in Python these days.
I don't want to diss lxml, but since it's not in the standard library,
I imagine far more people use element tree.
> Who is not
> using lxml?
I don't. I don't
On 6/30/09 7:03 PM, Stephan Richter wrote:
> It is needed for the "latest-versions" script as this parses XML. I consider
> lxml pretty much the standard tool to do XML in Python these days. Who is not
> using lxml?
I suspect the majority of people who use OSX as their main platform try
to stay a
On Tuesday 30 June 2009, Jim Fulton wrote:
> I should know this, but I don't. What is the recommended way to test
> changes to core ZTK packages to mitigate the risk that changes affect
> other packages? Is there a page somewhere with instructions?
>
> I tried using using zope.release. Buildi
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Mon Jun 29 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Tue Jun 30 12:00:00 2009 UTC.
There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Mon Jun 29 20:49:37 EDT 2009
URL: http://
I have to chime in here too
lxml is a real pain and seems to be problematic to get a straightforward
build for packages other than ZTK as well. I have had varying success
building lxml even under ubuntu - success seems to be dependant on the type
of build defined.
T
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 6:28
I should know this, but I don't. What is the recommended way to test
changes to core ZTK packages to mitigate the risk that changes affect
other packages? Is there a page somewhere with instructions?
I tried using using zope.release. Building the trunk of zope.release
with Python 2.4 and
20 matches
Mail list logo