Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.12 - one more ZPublisher event

2009-11-12 Thread Leonardo Rochael Almeida
Wouldn't it be better to just move IPubFailure before the abort? Is there a reason for subscribing to such an event which would required the transaction to be aborted already? I can see the usefulness of the transaction being already doom()ed before this event, but not aborted. On Wed, Nov 11,

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.12 - one more ZPublisher event

2009-11-12 Thread Martin Aspeli
Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote: Wouldn't it be better to just move IPubFailure before the abort? Is there a reason for subscribing to such an event which would required the transaction to be aborted already? I can see the usefulness of the transaction being already doom()ed before this event,

[Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 6 OK, 1 Unknown

2009-11-12 Thread Zope Tests Summarizer
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Wed Nov 11 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Thu Nov 12 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 7 messages: 1 from Carlos.Solis, 6 from Zope Tests. Unknown --- Subject: Automated Acceptance Test From: Carlos.Solis Date: Wed Nov 11 12:37:04 EST 2009 URL:

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.12 - one more ZPublisher event

2009-11-12 Thread Leonardo Rochael Almeida
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:29, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote: Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote: Wouldn't it be better to just move IPubFailure before the abort? [...] I can see the usefulness of the transaction being already doom()ed before this event, but not aborted. There is