Thomas Lotze wrote:
[snip]
How are we going to organise the work? Do you intend to sketch out a plan
for action? Should everyone create their own branches and experiment for a
while first?
I think you're the main volunteer we have to work on this, so I suggest
you try your stuff on a branch.
Godefroid Chapelle wrote:
[snip]
I tried to follow this discussion closely: however, I cannot say that I
understand if doing multi-adaptation with IFoo(bar, baz, boo) has been
rejected or postponed.
Multi adaptation with IFoo(foo, bar) is off the agenda. Whether that
means a permanent
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hi there,
I think we've had enough discussion to make a decision.
I'm a little worried that neither Stephan Richter, nor Jim Fulton have
had much weight in on this. They seem like important stakeholders. :)
Stephan has chipped in on this
Thomas Lotze wrote:
[snip]
I'd be happy to lead this effort, if you like to put it like that. I
wouldn't want to take it out of Martijn's hands, though, unless he's happy
with it as well, given that he's the one who started the discussion.
By all means take the lead on the implementation. :)
Brian Sutherland wrote:
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 03:11:07PM -0700, Shane Hathaway wrote:
Godefroid Chapelle wrote:
I tried to follow this discussion closely: however, I cannot say that I
understand if doing multi-adaptation with IFoo(bar, baz, boo) has been
rejected or postponed.
AFAICT,
Hi,
On 12/03/2009 06:41 PM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hi there,
I think we've had enough discussion to make a decision. Hopefully
everybody is at least reasonably happy with this:
An adapt() method will be added to Interface. It takes the objects to
adapt as *args, and optional but explicit
Gary Poster wrote:
I would think we would want to follow the pattern of the adapter_hooks in
zope.interface.interface, including the C optimizations.
Speaking of adapter hooks: If I'm not completely mistaken, adapter hooks
know about exactly one object to be adapted. To follow the pattern of
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote:
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hi there,
I think we've had enough discussion to make a decision.
I'm a little worried that neither Stephan Richter, nor Jim Fulton have
had much weight in on this.
