This is the summary for test reports received on the
zope-tests list between 2011-05-12 00:00:00 UTC and 2011-05-13 00:00:00 UTC:
See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds.
An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our
buildbot documentation:
http://docs.zope.org/
On 5/10/11 11:01 PM, Andreas Jung wrote:
> Please take a cup of coffee and relax.
Bah, your suggestions conflict!
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Relat
Great, GO TEAM!
On 5/10/11 2:57 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
> And just talk about 'Zope community has grown' instead of starting with
> "Zope Corp. and the Zope community", which I think gives the impression
> the community is some kind of appendage to Zope corp, the driving force
> behind it all.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> [1]FAILED Zope Buildbot / zope2.13-py2.7 slave-ubuntu64
>https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-May/040775.html
>
>
> [2]FAILED Zope Buildbot / zope2.14-py2.7 slave-ubuntu64
>https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
> On Friday, May 13, 2011 12:12:38 PM UTC+2, Charlie Clark wrote:
>
> Am 10.05.2011, 06:55 Uhr, schrieb Andreas Jung :
>
> > Constructive criticism and feedback is welcome _now_.
>
> Hi Andreas,
>
> alon
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 12:12, Charlie Clark
wrote:
> One thing that I think is missing on the resource page is a Products
> overview - PyPI isn't really suitable for someone wanting to see whether
> Zope (2) is suitable for them and despite what we now think about how to
> extend Zope, the Produc
Am 10.05.2011, 06:55 Uhr, schrieb Andreas Jung :
> Constructive criticism and feedback is welcome _now_.
Hi Andreas,
along with others I'd like to thank you and the team for taking the time
to do this. The new site has a clear message and looks good - not sure if
the Zope logo should be repe