Chris McDonough wrote:
dtml-in "Catalog(textindex='foo' AND fieldindex='bar' OR
keywordindex=['flop'])"
Chris, how hard would it be to expose ZCatalog's set lazy union and intersection
operators?
IIRC, ZCatalog does a lot of this internally so it shouldn't be that hard to do?
(right?!
Hi,
I was wondering, is there a way I can choose whether I want searchResults
to Or, Not or And the search? Or do I need to combine searchResult calls
and what not?
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No, unfortunately.
You need to manually do unions or intersections on results from multiple
calls to searchRequest currently.
Erik Enge wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering, is there a way I can choose whether I want searchResults
to Or, Not or And the search? Or do I need to combine searchResult
On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
You need to manually do unions or intersections on results from multiple
calls to searchRequest currently.
Is this a feature to be implemented? If not, why not?
Oh, and by the way, "searchRequest"?
___
On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
You need to manually do unions or intersections on
results from multiple
calls to searchRequest currently.
Is this a feature to be implemented? If not, why not?
DC has no no concrete plans to implement operators or precedence in
Marco Nova wrote:
DC has no no concrete plans to implement operators or precedence in
catalog queries, although I think it's a really
super-worthwhile idea.
We're currently focusing on the things in the Zope 2.4 plan (see
http://dev.zope.org/Resources/zope_240_plan.html). If
someone
BTW, it *is* possible to use AND, NOT, OR, and ANDNOT in the body of a
textindex query, e.g.
dtml-in "Catalog(textindex="foo and bar or farfoo andnot flea")
This is not a problem.
But the original question (and what is not possible currently), is how
to do something like:
dtml-in
Chris McDonough wrote:
Erik Enge wrote:
On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
You need to manually do unions or intersections on results from multiple
calls to searchRequest currently.
Is this a feature to be implemented? If not, why not?
DC has no no concrete plans
This is a project I have been keeping in the back of my mind for a while
now. At present I do not have the resources to devote, but it is my hope
that this will change. I feel strongly that that ZCatalog should have a
general query language on par with an SQL where clause. Much of the work
Chris McDonough wrote:
BTW, some changes are coming to the way we allow contributions to the Zope
codebase which have the potential to reduce the DC "drag factor" for this
and other similar projects.
- C
I await this process change with great curiousity.
As for the ZCatalog proposal, I
10 matches
Mail list logo