On Oct 19, 2007, at 5:07 PM, Jeff Kowalczyk wrote:
Would someone be willing to add the PILwoTk-1.1.6.3(-py2.4-linux-
i686).egg
to PyPI?
Binaries, except for Windows, should never never be uploaded to PyPI
(or download.zope.org). There are just too many variables to
building binaries.
Would someone be willing to add the PILwoTk-1.1.6.3(-py2.4-linux-i686).egg
to PyPI?
If PILwoTk becomes a PyPI entry, I'd like to ask a follow-up on the Plone
list to see if ploneout buildouts can/should by default depend on PILwoTk
to satisfy Plone-3.0's PIL dependency.
I'm able to use PILwoTk
In the meantime, that URL is meant to be there forever, so those
who want it should feel free to use it.
- C
On Oct 19, 2007, at 6:52 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
On Oct 19, 2007, at 6:44 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
If you mean sane in the sense of setuptools-compatible, I've
actually
If you mean sane in the sense of setuptools-compatible, I've actually
repackaged PIL to use setuptools here:
http://dist.repoze.org/PIL-1.1.6.tar.gz
On Oct 19, 2007, at 5:17 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
On Oct 19, 2007, at 5:07 PM, Jeff Kowalczyk wrote:
Would someone be willing to add the
On Oct 19, 2007, at 6:44 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
If you mean sane in the sense of setuptools-compatible, I've
actually repackaged PIL to use setuptools here:
http://dist.repoze.org/PIL-1.1.6.tar.gz
OK, so now we *both* have. :)
It would be better, IMO, if we could get Fredrik to make
