-> > I'd like to second this. There's nothing more annoying than a
-> > "corporate"-sponsered Open Source project ignoring patches from the
-> > community...
->
->
-> maybe you'd like to re-evaulate that comment given the rest of the thread ;-)
I'm delighted to see the prompt r
Thanks much!!
Joseph Wayne Norton wrote:
> Ok .. here's the collector url:
>
> http://collector.zope.org/Zope/108
>
> - j
>
> At Fri, 28 Dec 2001 00:14:21 -0500,
> Chris McDonough wrote:
>
>>>At the time, I hadn't received any feedback (however, I'm not blaming
>>>anyone). I also never post
> > > Just to be safe ... You shouldn't use this entire patch unless your
> > > server is behind apache or a proxy server and best if protected by a
> > > firewall. It could open a potential security leak if you use the
> > > "domains" field for authentication and the zope server is not
> > > pro
Ok .. here's the collector url:
http://collector.zope.org/Zope/108
- j
At Fri, 28 Dec 2001 00:14:21 -0500,
Chris McDonough wrote:
>
> > At the time, I hadn't received any feedback (however, I'm not blaming
> > anyone). I also never posted this to the collector before. Should one
> > of us
Derek Simkowiak wrote:
>
> I'd like to second this. There's nothing more annoying than a
> "corporate"-sponsered Open Source project ignoring patches from the
> community...
maybe you'd like to re-evaulate that comment given the rest of the thread ;-)
Chris
__
At Fri, 28 Dec 2001 00:14:21 -0500,
Chris McDonough wrote:
>
> > At the time, I hadn't received any feedback (however, I'm not blaming
> > anyone). I also never posted this to the collector before. Should one
> > of us post this?
>
> It would be appreciated, Joseph.
ok ... I can post this aft
> At the time, I hadn't received any feedback (however, I'm not blaming
> anyone). I also never posted this to the collector before. Should one
> of us post this?
It would be appreciated, Joseph.
> Just to be safe ... You shouldn't use this entire patch unless your
> server is behind apache or
Adam -
At Thu, 27 Dec 2001 21:42:10 -0500,
Adam Manock wrote:
>
> It was written against 2.4.1
> I run 2.4.3.
> It would have been really nice if it had been included in Zope 2.4.next..
>
> Hmm, has anything else changed that I need to be aware of before applying
> the patch?
>
FYI.
I
Sigh.
Is this in the Collector, by any chance?
- Original Message -
From: "Derek Simkowiak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Adam Manock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 10:46 PM
Subject: Re: [Zope-dev]
-> Fellow Zope addicts,
I'd like to second this. There's nothing more annoying than a
"corporate"-sponsered Open Source project ignoring patches from the
community...
--Derek
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org
Fellow Zope addicts,
I do both name and IP based virtual hosting from a single Apache instance,
proxypassing
to various different places within Zope. It works great, with or without
Apache working
mod_ssl magic!
Except.
There's a little issue with Zope logging to be solved.
Zope logs the
11 matches
Mail list logo