Tres Seaver wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Log message for revision 66185:
update to latest revision of ZODB 3.6 for upcoming release
Should'nt we be tagging a ZODB release for this? I *really* don't like
the practice of releasing a product which has non-tagged dependencies
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Log message for revision 66185:
update to latest revision of ZODB 3.6 for upcoming release
Should'nt we be tagging a ZODB release for this? I *really* don't like
the practice of releasing a product which has
--On 26. März 2006 14:31:25 -0500 Tres Seaver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Log message for revision 66185:
update to latest revision of ZODB 3.6 for upcoming release
Should'nt we be tagging a ZODB release for
