Re: [Zope-dev] Significance of the ZODB split?

2000-12-08 Thread John D. Heintz
The Sourceforge exposure gives people like me with an itch to scratch a place to work on a publicly visible branch of ZODB for my two proposals without breaking anything or relying on patch files continually. John Heintz PS My proposals are ExplicitTransactions and PersistentBlob ;-) Michel

Re: [Zope-dev] Significance of the ZODB split?

2000-12-08 Thread Robin Becker
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jeremy Hylton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes "RB" == Robin Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: RB Anyone know why AM Kuchling needs to split off a Sourceforge RB project based on ZODB? I really liked the ZEO examples, but RB where's this going? It is the most

Re: [Zope-dev] Significance of the ZODB split?

2000-12-07 Thread Michel Pelletier
On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, Robin Becker wrote: Anyone know why AM Kuchling needs to split off a Sourceforge project based on ZODB? I don't think it's a "split", but AMK is using ZODB internally at his job, and externally with his own projects, so I can see him wanting to have some control over the

Re: [Zope-dev] Significance of the ZODB split?

2000-12-07 Thread Simon Michael
Michel Pelletier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I am, in particular, barely not lazy enough to check stuff into branches, much less whole other repositories. ;) Nicely put. Posted on zwiki.org so I can use it later. :) -Simon ___ Zope-Dev maillist -