I wasn't aware of that effort, thanks for pointing it out. I was only
tinkering so of course that project is a much more complete solution
than what I was envisioning.
Went through problems.txt and more rapidly throught the specs, and I
liked what I saw. There is a formal statement on the hand
On Thu, 21 Mar 2002 08:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> How extensively is STX actually used? I've been looking at it myself
> recently, and the whole system seem rather simplistic to me in how it
> parses the text. I'm talking specifically of the STX version currently
> standard in Zope 2.5 (and 2
How extensively is STX actually used? I've been looking at it myself
recently, and the whole system seem rather simplistic to me in how it
parses the text. I'm talking specifically of the STX version currently
standard in Zope 2.5 (and 2.4 I think), which I believe is STXNG; I
haven't gone back t
