On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 18:41:20 -0200, Leonardo Rochael Almeida
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Should I bother with the collector entry or is it a known limitation no
> one is going to bother with? :-)
It's not a bad idea to file a report in the collector. While I've no
plan to change it myself, that'
Em Seg, 2005-02-14 às 13:36 -0500, Fred Drake escreveu:
> On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:22:38 -0200, Leonardo Rochael Almeida
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It's obvious that the "container-class" directive is being "evaluated"
> > much earlier than the "products" directive. Without delving further into
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:22:38 -0200, Leonardo Rochael Almeida
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's obvious that the "container-class" directive is being "evaluated"
> much earlier than the "products" directive. Without delving further into
> the code, it looks like the "container-class" directive has a
Hi,
I found a problematic corner case in the interaction between two zconfig
directives:
If I set the "products" directive to a value other than the standard
ones (SOFTWARE_HOME/Products or INSTANCE_HOME/Products) AND set the
container-class directive of the section to a class that is
only avail
