Christian Scholz wrote:
>
> > yeah, this is exactly what I'm after too. I'd like the virtual objects
> > the specialist is responsible for to have normal Zope management
> > screens.
>
> Well, I think this shouldn't be too difficult to create. Just a subclass
> of Specialist and add some Content
Hi!
> > Well, virtual in the sense as a specialist is no real folder but can
> > provide content from different sources. Thus what I mean is some mechanism
> > which emulates objectIds() etc. so it looks to the user (and the ones
> > using it via dtml) like a normal folder object.
> > Somehow lik
Christian Scholz wrote:
>
> Well, virtual in the sense as a specialist is no real folder but can
> provide content from different sources. Thus what I mean is some mechanism
> which emulates objectIds() etc. so it looks to the user (and the ones
> using it via dtml) like a normal folder object.
Hi Steve!
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 10:45:46PM +, Steve Alexander wrote:
> Steve Spicklemire wrote:
>
> >
> > CS> 2. Is it planned to provide something like a virtual folder
> > CS> which acts like a normal object manager but is controlled via
> > CS> ZPatterns (so actually someth
Hi!
Actually should answer to these posts... ;-)
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 03:11:37PM -0500, Steve Spicklemire wrote:
>
> Hi Christian,
>
> Well, nobody else answered that I saw... so I'll take a crack
> at your questions
>
> > "CS" == Christian Scholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
Steve Alexander wrote:
>
> return getattr(container.path.to.somewhere, name)
>
> That's the simple version, and it won't give the traversed-to object the
> correct context most of the time. To do that, I'd need to use an
> external method, and use the __of__ method to give the returned objec
Steve Spicklemire wrote:
>
> CS> 2. Is it planned to provide something like a virtual folder
> CS> which acts like a normal object manager but is controlled via
> CS> ZPatterns (so actually something like Folder with Customizer
> CS> Support just without the "anchor" in ZODB. (w
Hi Christian,
Well, nobody else answered that I saw... so I'll take a crack
at your questions
> "CS" == Christian Scholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
CS> Hi there!
CS> Finally I managed to get a basic understanding of how to do
CS> things with ZPatterns ;-) So seems quite
Hi there!
Finally I managed to get a basic understanding of how to do things with
ZPatterns ;-) So seems quite cool :)
(and hopefully I find some time to write some basic howto about it)
But I have some little questions:
1. Is it possible to retrieve the set of known IDs from a specialist?
At 11:58 PM 8/9/00 +0100, Steve Alexander wrote:
>
>1: ZClass instances can have PropertySheets added to them, independently
>of any sheets declared in the ZClass class definition.
>
>I've been working with Zope for a while, but this had never occurred to
>me. I guess this is just another one of t
Hmm... this is probably more of a plain Zope question than a ZPatterns
question.. but since I'm *using* ZPatterns, I thought I'd check
what other folks are doing to implement apps with ZPatterns.
I've been creating Specialists with DataSkin subclassed objects
in their defaultRacks. The methods
Thanks for your answers, Phillip.
Here's what I've learned. I still need to try these out on a test
system, to prove to myself that they work the way I think they do.
1: ZClass instances can have PropertySheets added to them, independently
of any sheets declared in the ZClass class definition.
At 06:07 PM 8/8/00 +0100, Steve Alexander wrote:
>"Phillip J. Eby" wrote:
>>
>> Actually, neither relates. Property sheets created on ZClasses always have
>> their data stored in attributes of the object itself, so if you want to
>> control those property sheets you would not use a sheet provide
"Phillip J. Eby" wrote:
>
> Actually, neither relates. Property sheets created on ZClasses always have
> their data stored in attributes of the object itself, so if you want to
> control those property sheets you would not use a sheet provider at all.
> Sheet providers are only used to provide
14 matches
Mail list logo