Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Sounds like you did the research.
I've considered all packages mentioned in the current ztk.cfg that come
from the zope.* namespace. The BBB stuff from zope.location.pickling is
neither used by any of them, nor do compat-tests involving the pinned
versions of those packag
Thomas Lotze wrote:
> I asked about this before; let me do so again before assuming silence to
> mean consent:
>
> There's a PathPersistent class in zope.location.pickling which is
> decorated with a recent BBB comment, and had been questioned by a XXX
> comment for some time before that.
>
> The
Hello,
* 2009-09-16 15:34, Thomas Lotze wrote:
> There's a PathPersistent class in zope.location.pickling which is
> decorated with a recent BBB comment, and had been questioned by a XXX
> comment for some time before that.
>
> [snip]
>
> Does anyone object to these changes?
+1, I fully agree w
I asked about this before; let me do so again before assuming silence to
mean consent:
There's a PathPersistent class in zope.location.pickling which is
decorated with a recent BBB comment, and had been questioned by a XXX
comment for some time before that.
The class doesn't seem to be used anywh
While wondering about the ITraverser interface being defined by
zope.location, we noticed that the zope.location.pickling.PathPersistent
class (which is this package's only user of the interface) is decorated
with a recent BBB comment, and had been questioned by a XXX comment for
some time before t
