Re: [Zope-dev] zope.testing 3.8 fails in mysterious ways

2009-08-12 Thread Godefroid Chapelle
Marius Gedminas wrote: On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 01:17:41PM +0200, Andreas Zeidler wrote: just fyi: the bug is also present in zope.testing 3.7.7 (showing up when testing plone.z3cform). would it perhaps be possible to release a fixed 3.7.8 soon, so that our buildout stops complaining again?

Re: [Zope-dev] zope.testing 3.8 fails in mysterious ways

2009-08-03 Thread Andreas Zeidler
hi, just fyi: the bug is also present in zope.testing 3.7.7 (showing up when testing plone.z3cform). would it perhaps be possible to release a fixed 3.7.8 soon, so that our buildout stops complaining again? :) cheers, andi Godefroid Chapelle wrote: Sidnei da Silva wrote: On Thu, Jul 30,

Re: [Zope-dev] zope.testing 3.8 fails in mysterious ways

2009-08-03 Thread Marius Gedminas
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 01:17:41PM +0200, Andreas Zeidler wrote: just fyi: the bug is also present in zope.testing 3.7.7 (showing up when testing plone.z3cform). would it perhaps be possible to release a fixed 3.7.8 soon, so that our buildout stops complaining again? :) I looked at the bug

Re: [Zope-dev] zope.testing 3.8 fails in mysterious ways

2009-08-02 Thread Christian Theune
On 08/01/2009 01:35 AM, Godefroid Chapelle wrote: Sidnei da Silva wrote: On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Martin Aspelioptilude+li...@gmail.com wrote: Unfortunately, I've got other packages that depend on a newer zope.testing (specifically, collective.testcaselayer). But I thought

Re: [Zope-dev] zope.testing 3.8 fails in mysterious ways

2009-08-02 Thread Martin Aspeli
Christian Theune wrote: On 08/01/2009 01:35 AM, Godefroid Chapelle wrote: Sidnei da Silva wrote: On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Martin Aspelioptilude+li...@gmail.com wrote: Unfortunately, I've got other packages that depend on a newer zope.testing (specifically,

Re: [Zope-dev] zope.testing 3.8 fails in mysterious ways

2009-07-31 Thread Godefroid Chapelle
Sidnei da Silva wrote: On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Martin Aspelioptilude+li...@gmail.com wrote: Unfortunately, I've got other packages that depend on a newer zope.testing (specifically, collective.testcaselayer). But I thought zope.testing aimed to be able to run any valid tests, so it

Re: [Zope-dev] zope.testing 3.8 fails in mysterious ways

2009-07-31 Thread Martin Aspeli
Sidnei da Silva wrote: On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Martin Aspelioptilude+li...@gmail.com wrote: Unfortunately, I've got other packages that depend on a newer zope.testing (specifically, collective.testcaselayer). But I thought zope.testing aimed to be able to run any valid tests, so it

[Zope-dev] zope.testing 3.8 fails in mysterious ways

2009-07-30 Thread Martin Aspeli
Hi, I'm running the plone.z3cform tests in a Zope 2.10 instance with zope.testing 3.8 installed. All other tests seem to work OK, but with plone.z3cform's tests, I get: $ ./bin/instance test -s plone.z3cform Running tests at level 1 Running plone.z3cform.testing_zcml_layer tests: Set up

Re: [Zope-dev] zope.testing 3.8 fails in mysterious ways

2009-07-30 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Martin Aspeli wrote: Hi, I'm running the plone.z3cform tests in a Zope 2.10 instance with zope.testing 3.8 installed. All other tests seem to work OK, but with plone.z3cform's tests, I get: $ ./bin/instance test -s plone.z3cform Running

Re: [Zope-dev] zope.testing 3.8 fails in mysterious ways

2009-07-30 Thread Martin Aspeli
Tres Seaver wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Martin Aspeli wrote: Hi, I'm running the plone.z3cform tests in a Zope 2.10 instance with zope.testing 3.8 installed. All other tests seem to work OK, but with plone.z3cform's tests, I get: $ ./bin/instance test -s

Re: [Zope-dev] zope.testing 3.8 fails in mysterious ways

2009-07-30 Thread Sidnei da Silva
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Martin Aspelioptilude+li...@gmail.com wrote: Unfortunately, I've got other packages that depend on a newer zope.testing (specifically, collective.testcaselayer). But I thought zope.testing aimed to be able to run any valid tests, so it sounds like a bug in