Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: [Zope-dev] December release post-mortem

2006-01-18 Thread Jim Fulton
Andreas Jung wrote: ... I think 2.9.0 is the _real_ 2.9 beta which will be widely used by ppl :-) I could be wrong, but if we stick to a 6-month release cycle for feature releases, I don't think there is going to be much appetite for bug-fix releases, except in extreme cases, and I think it

Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: [Zope-dev] December release post-mortem

2006-01-18 Thread Sidnei da Silva
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 04:37:12PM +0100, Andreas Jung wrote: | I'll repeat or emphasis that the windows release process needs to | be simple enough that *I* can do it. | | Well, that's a perfect goal :-) But my experience with doing slightly | simple programming tasks on Windows is that Windows

Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: [Zope-dev] December release post-mortem

2006-01-18 Thread Martijn Faassen
Sidnei da Silva wrote: [snip OS flamewar in the bud] :) Regards, Martijn ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists -

Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: [Zope-dev] December release post-mortem

2006-01-18 Thread Martijn Faassen
Jim Fulton wrote: Andreas Jung wrote: ... I think 2.9.0 is the _real_ 2.9 beta which will be widely used by ppl :-) I could be wrong, but if we stick to a 6-month release cycle for feature releases, I don't think there is going to be much appetite for bug-fix releases, except in extreme