On 10/5/07, Laurence Rowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've tested my patch (datetime.datetime support) against Amos's branch
and it applies cleanly and all tests pass.
Cool! Are there tests to make sure old pickles still work, or do we
know that this is the case for sure?
--
Lennart Regebro:
On 10/5/07, Laurence Rowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems though that the new timezones are not used much... doing a
DateTime() gives me DateTime('2007/10/05 14:20:27.204176 GMT+1') (with
my pathc applied too). Looking up tz = d._tzinfo[d.timezone()] gives me
an old style timezone, as _tz is
On 10/5/07, Laurence Rowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If anyone thinks it is important I could an explicit upgrade path for
instances with a _millis attribute too (most current instances I would
assume).
I think the code must work with current instances without modifying them.
--
Lennart
On 10/5/07, Laurence Rowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All the tests still pass if I comment out the assignment:
def _upgrade_old(self):
Upgrades a previously pickled DateTime object.
micros = long(math.floor(self._t * 100.0))
#self._micros = micros # don't
