Or how about this person?
http://lists.zope.org/pipermail/zope-cmf/2001-June/007435.html
oh oh a storm gotta go
-jimbo
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
Please remove the del statement in the ZODB __init__.py file to make this
possible. I am simply trying to create my own Transaction objects and can't
without patching the StandaloneZODB release to do this.
Thanks,
John
On Friday 08 June 2001 16:21, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> At 04:58 PM 6/8/01
--On Wednesday, June 06, 2001 11:50:43 AM -0700 jimbo
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I hope this helps. I wanted to add my feelings on the whole documentation
> issue. It seems to me that the whole process caters around developers
> too much.
>>I have to disagree with you **in the context of thi
At 04:58 PM 6/8/01 -0400, Shane Hathaway wrote:
>On Thursday 07 June 2001 21:28, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> > Upon being told to perform a transaction or subtransaction commit,
> > the transaction would notify all the ruleAgents, and then all the
> > indexingAgents. Objects could still subscribe to
On Thursday 07 June 2001 21:28, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> Yep. One of the last two times I spoke with Jim in person (either
> the January DC visit or IPC 8, I forget which), he said something
> about it maybe being a good idea to have some kind of priority system
> like that. I'd love to see someth
After dealing with using Zope for websites for two years, I've come to
the point where I think implicit acquisition should be an optional
feature when retrieving web content that looks less like objects and
more like folders of documents.
Implicit acquisition means that when you ask for
"/fold
Christian Theune writes:
> Internet Explorer and Netscape ignore the path of the cookie
> and assume '/'.
Who told you that?
We use code explicitly setting the cookie path and
it appears both IE and Netscape handle this correctly.
> Second:
>
> Opera is conform to the rfc of http 1.1, and
Erik Enge schrieb:
> On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Stian Jenssen wrote:
>
> > Hi there!
>
> Hello :)
>
> > I wan't to use php with zope, does anybody know how the header syntax
> > shall look like? Tried diffrent syntaxes but i get wierd outputs, not
> > as expected.
>
> Try this one: http://www.zope.org/M
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 09:42:00AM -0400, Andreas Jung wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 09:36:53AM -0400, Evan Simpson wrote:
> > > From: "Martijn Pieters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > REQUEST['SCRIPT_NAME'] is the root of the Zope server. In a pure
> ZServer
> > > > environment, this is '/'. In
- Original Message -
From: "Martijn Pieters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Evan Simpson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Christian Theune" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 9:31 AM
Subject: Re: [Zope-dev] Bug in Zope VersionControl
> On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 09:36:
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 09:36:53AM -0400, Evan Simpson wrote:
> From: "Martijn Pieters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > REQUEST['SCRIPT_NAME'] is the root of the Zope server. In a pure ZServer
> > environment, this is '/'. In a situation where the Zope server is running
> > behind another webserver, and i
From: "Martijn Pieters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> REQUEST['SCRIPT_NAME'] is the root of the Zope server. In a pure ZServer
> environment, this is '/'. In a situation where the Zope server is running
> behind another webserver, and is not at the root of that server,
> SCRIPT_NAME represents the path to
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 02:22:54PM +0200, Christian Theune wrote:
> >
> > I think we want to use:
> >
> > RESPOSE.setCookie(
> > path=(REQUEST['SCRIPT_NAME'] or '/'))
> >
> > Could you file a bug in the Bug Collector at:
> >
> > http://classic.zope.org:8080/Collector
> >
> > Tha
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 02:17:06PM +0200, Christian Theune wrote:
> yes. we are right. Opera only sends the cookie in the version, but i couldn't
> figure out, what zope is sending (using the tcpwatch proxy). so i don't know
> what zope returns ...
> the should be a line
>
> <== Cookie: ...
>
>
On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Stian Jenssen wrote:
> Hi there!
Hello :)
> I wan't to use php with zope, does anybody know how the header syntax
> shall look like? Tried diffrent syntaxes but i get wierd outputs, not
> as expected.
Try this one: http://www.zope.org/Members/Mamey/PHP>.
(Could we please keep the list in the loop for both wider discussion and
archiving?)
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 01:43:29PM +0200, Christian Theune wrote:
> > REQUEST['SCRIPT_NAME'] is the root of the Zope server. In a pure ZServer
> > environment, this is '/'. In a situation where the Zope server is
Hi Gregor,
> First off, please don't send HTML mail to the list.
Ouch! Sorry! Easy mistake to make.
>
> You will have to set the Content-Type HTTP header to do that:
> REQUEST.RESPONSE.setHeader('Content-Type', content_type)
> where content_type is the right MIME type of the file you return, e
> I am compressing files which need to be uncompressed inline
> before download. The DTML calles a python method
> in the product which returns the uncompressed file data. Say
> this file is an MSWord document, how do I return this as a file
> to download? Presently, the browser just trie
On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Stephan Richter wrote:
> See an earlier post on a different thread. Chris wrote that the
> license is BSDish and is therefore compatible with ZPL. This means
> that mxDateTime could be distributed with Zope.
Yes, but in the proposal Andreas mentions the GPL, not the ZPL, and
unsubscribe!!!
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Im Auftrag
von [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 8. Juni 2001 12:08
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Zope-Dev digest, Vol 1 #1148 - 12 msgs
Send Zope-Dev mailing list submissions to
[EMAIL
I am compressing
files which need to be uncompressed inline before download. The DTML
" calles a python method in the product which returns the
uncompressed file data. Say this file is an MSWord document, how do I return
this as a file to download? Presently, the browser just tries to displa
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 08:30:26PM +0200, Christian Theune wrote:
> Okay ... I admit using opera and enjoying it.
>
> Problem is, that opera is sooo standardsconform.
>
> See Zope/lib/python/Products/OFSP/Version.py:175
> in function enter()
>
> Somebody thats the path for the cookie as SCRIPT_
>Shouldn't it be focused on compatability with the ZPL instead of the
>GPL? From what I hear, there still are issues with, for example,
>distributing Python Products as GPL with Zope.
>
>Anyone with better knowledge about this care to enlighten me?
See an earlier post on a different thread. Chr
On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, Andreas Jung wrote:
> Feel free to review and comment the propsal to replace
> the current DateTime module of Zope by the mxDateTime module:
>From the proposal:
"""
License issues
mxDateTime stands under the EGENIX Public License that is considered to be
an Open Source lice
> Hi there!
>
> I wan't to use php with zope, does anybody know how the header syntax
> shall look like?
> Tried diffrent syntaxes but i get wierd outputs, not as expected.
>
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/l
25 matches
Mail list logo
