On Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 07:49:40PM -0700, ender wrote:
On Saturday 23 June 2001 11:20, Erik Enge wrote:
[Simon Michael]
| Now you're talking. Seconded.
Me too!
i'd very much like to see a GPL compatible zope license as well, both for
products i create and to integrate with third
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Dieter Maurer wrote:
Rene Pijlman writes:
A suggestion to cut the Zope learning curve down by half a day...
When the programmer forgets the docstring in a method of a Python-based
product, instead of saying
Sorry, the requested resource does not exist.
Chris McDonough wrote:
This purpose aligns well with those of the ArmoredCatalog proposal as well..
see http://dev.zope.org/Wikis/DevSite/Proposals/ArmoredCatalog .
But even using such a lazy catalog awareness, you might get into
trouble. Using the ZCatalog's find objects function, I
Chris McDonough wrote:
A solution might be a kind of lazy catalog awareness: Instead of
mangling a new object through one or more catalogs when it is created,
this object could be added to a list of objects to be cataloged later.
This way, the transaction to insert a new object would
The situation:
- Oracle 8.1.7
installed on a machine (excalibur) running SuSE Linux 7.0 (i386) - Kernel
2.2.16 (2).
- Zope Version: Zope 2.3.3 (binary release, python 1.5.2, win32-x86)
Python Version: 1.5.2 (#0, Jul 30 1999, 09:52:18) [MSC 32 bit (Intel)]
System Platform: win32
installed on
Chris McDonough wrote:
This purpose aligns well with those of the ArmoredCatalog proposal as
well..
see http://dev.zope.org/Wikis/DevSite/Proposals/ArmoredCatalog .
But even using such a lazy catalog awareness, you might get into
trouble. Using the ZCatalog's find objects function,
On 25 Jun 2001 10:26:10 -0400, Shane Hathaway wrote:
According to management, there's a zope-license list somewhere and we
expect to move to a GPL compatible license. Paul says:
I think the goal should be for Zope and Python to converge on the same
license, with perhaps the new license
On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 12:22:32PM -0700, Michael R. Bernstein wrote:
Other than keeping the door open for this eventuality, is there any
other reason to choose a BSD style license over the GPL?
...
Unless I've misunderstood something (which is certainly possible), DC
doesn't seem to have
I'm thinking here that subclassing Script is the way to go for
any object that needs finer control on how it is called - and
I'll say that of any class that doesn't just do
index_html = HTMLFile(foo, globals())
So, I wrote a How-To. It's definitely not ready for prime-time,
as I haven't
(I removed [EMAIL PROTECTED].)
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Giovanni Maruzzelli wrote:
Any hints on how to manage something like? We use both textindexes,
fieldindexes, and keywordsindexes (textindex on string properties,
fieldindexes on boolean and datetime, keywordindex on strings). Maybe
one
On 25 Jun 2001, Michael R. Bernstein wrote:
Other than keeping the door open for this eventuality, is there any
other reason to choose a BSD style license over the GPL?
Yes. A commercial one; an imperative one. If I make a Zope Python
Product, I must license it as GPL to be able to
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Shane Hathaway wrote:
(Paul says:) I think the goal should be for Zope and Python to
converge on the same license, with perhaps the new license being some
off-the-shelf license like Apache's.
Wow, lobbying the management team at DC is pretty easy ;-).
It's good to see
Part of the problem here is that if, in particular, you use the
reindex_object method of CatalogAware, the database will grow
unnecessarily even if the object hasn't changed. CatalogAware is
arguably broken and should really not be used. I'd like to have the
time to fix it, but fixing it
Maybe you search python.org for Guido's metaclasses article.
It tells that a Python class can be both a class and an instance
and that this view has interesting applications.
You focus on the class aspects of a ZClass (a pattern for creating
instances providing them with basic common
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001 05:22, Michael R. Bernstein wrote:
On 25 Jun 2001 10:26:10 -0400, Shane Hathaway wrote:
According to management, there's a zope-license list somewhere and we
expect to move to a GPL compatible license. Paul says:
I think the goal should be for Zope and Python to
It is at http://www.zope.org/Members/lalo/scriptclass-dev now;
this is a ZWikiPage, so you can comment right there. The real
address will be http://www.zope.org/Members/lalo/scriptclass
when it's ready.
Mmmh, after reading the how-to (quickly), I do understand for what you are
using Script
Jerome Alet wrote
I personnally would love to see both Python and Zope be GPLed.
Why? No really. Exactly what do you gain from this? Assuming Zope's
license becomes GPL compatible, any packages you release you can choose
to GPL. Why do you think having the GPL is a good thing for the core
Michael R. Bernstein wrote
Unless I've misunderstood something (which is certainly possible), DC
doesn't seem to have anything to lose by switching from a BSD style
license to the GPL (or a GPL style license with an additional optional
attribution clause), and quite a bit to gain.
They
On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 06:36:30PM -0500, Stephan Richter wrote:
But when I started reading it, I wanted to learn more of how I could
implement a new scripting language into Zope, such as a ZOQL (as mentioned
on the SmartObjects mailing list:
Johnson, Michael (MIJOHNSO) writes:
... getattr does not work for attributes of inherited ZClasses ...
getattr does no special things for folderish items.
It simply accesses the attributes of an object in case,
you can not use the attribute access syntax
object.attribute
because either
Hello Zopistas,
we are developing a Zope 2.3.3 (py 1.5.2) application that will add, index
and reindex some tens of thousands
objects (Zclass that are DTMLDocument on steroids) on some twenty properties
each day, while
the absolute number of objects cataloged keeps growing (think at content
Giovanni Maruzzelli wrote:
Hello Zopistas,
we are developing a Zope 2.3.3 (py 1.5.2) application that will add, index
and reindex some tens of thousands
objects (Zclass that are DTMLDocument on steroids) on some twenty properties
each day, while
the absolute number of objects cataloged
22 matches
Mail list logo
