Re: [Zope-dev] Unit testing on win32 with FAT requires patch to custom_zodb.py,isthis a known issue?

2002-09-11 Thread Chris Withers
Craeg K Strong wrote: I was just curious as to what the status is on this. I just had to apply the patch to yet another Win2000 computer. Thanks, Well, whoever packages the Win32 binaries needs to re-package them properly. OR we need to be told that Data.fs.in should no longer be used. In

Re: [Zope-dev] Trouble populating a dictionary of dictionaries

2002-09-11 Thread Lennart Regebro
From: Anton Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] After playing around for too long on it, I can't seem to get it to work. I even tried pre-filling the d-o-d with empty strings. I just don't understand what I am doing wrong. Your not thinking object oriented enough. Encapsulate, encapsulate, encapsulate.

Re: [Zope-dev] Some Zope distributions are missing Data.fs.in

2002-09-11 Thread Stefan H. Holek
Same thing on Debian. 'Data.fs.in' is missing there as well. This is a problem for me as the ZopeTestCase relies on a working Testing package and error reports start to trickle in... AFAIK, 'Data.fs.in' already contains things like the root Application object and the Control_Panel. If no base

[Zope-dev] Logging in as admin and impersonating another user - is it possible with Zopes sec policy?

2002-09-11 Thread Dario Lopez-Kästen
Hello! I am wondering if it is possible to write a userfolder that does the following: For certain categories of users, for instance Teachers, while keeping their current authorisation of Teachers, I need to let them impersonate a user with lower authorisation than they currently have, say

Re: [Zope-dev] Some Zope distributions are missing Data.fs.in

2002-09-11 Thread Jim Penny
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 03:49:25PM +0200, Stefan H. Holek wrote: Same thing on Debian. 'Data.fs.in' is missing there as well. This is a problem for me as the ZopeTestCase relies on a working Testing package and error reports start to trickle in... This is not correct. Data.fs.in is in

Re: [Zope-dev] Some Zope distributions are missing Data.fs.in

2002-09-11 Thread Stefan H. Holek
Good to hear that! However, I have received the following report: ---8--- I do have a 'Data.fs', 'Data.fs.lock' and 'Data.fs.tmp' files in the '/usr/lib/zope/var' directory, but no 'Data.fs.in' file. =( Is this bad? My zope is 2.5.1 and I'm using python 2.1.3. I installed zope using the

[Zope-dev] Zope-Dev digest, Vol 1 #1825 - 11 msgs

2002-09-11 Thread TGERMAINE
I am away on vacation until Sept 16. If your inquiry is urgent please resend your request to Chris Martin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and he will look after it. Alternatively, you can call Chris at 566-0604 Tom Germaine Access Services Administrator ___

[Zope-dev] Some Zope distributions are missing Data.fs.in

2002-09-11 Thread James Johnson
Hi all, I'm using win2k and zope2.5.1 and python 2.1.2. And I don't have the file Data.fs.in. I have the others files. Am I suppose to have this file on win32. tia, - James Good to hear that! However, I have received the following report: ---8--- I do have a 'Data.fs',

Re: [Zope-dev] Some Zope distributions are missing Data.fs.in

2002-09-11 Thread Matthew T. Kromer
James Johnson wrote: Hi all, I'm using win2k and zope2.5.1 and python 2.1.2. And I don't have the file Data.fs.in. I have the others files. Am I suppose to have this file on win32. tia, - James You don't need it; it merely provides a bootstrap of what Zope does on startup if

Re: [Zope-dev] Some Zope distributions are missing Data.fs.in

2002-09-11 Thread Stefan H. Holek
Matt, You need Data.fs.in to run unit tests. The Testing package does not work without it. See lib/python/Testing/custom_zodb.py. Stefan --On Mittwoch, 11. September 2002 16:25 -0400 Matthew T. Kromer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: James Johnson wrote: Hi all, I'm using win2k and

Re: [Zope-dev] Some Zope distributions are missing Data.fs.in

2002-09-11 Thread Shane Hathaway
Stefan H. Holek wrote: You need Data.fs.in to run unit tests. The Testing package does not work without it. See lib/python/Testing/custom_zodb.py. FWIW, I'm looking into removing that requirement. With a tweaked custom_zodb.py and minor changes to the sessioning machinery, all but three