Emiliano Marmonti wrote at 2003-9-17 22:51 -0300:
> Thanks Andrew, I'll try it.
> Now I'm testing inside Zope and everything looks well, except for:
>
> self.cat.addIndex('id','FieldIndex' )
> self.cat.addIndex('name' ,'FieldIndex' )
> self.cat.addIndex
Hello all
Finally could find where and how to add indexes in the actual way (think
so). Now I have another problem that have no idea how to fix it. Could
add objects into a ZODB separate database, could add the catalog and the
index, but when the database has one element, with every operation
(inc
Fred Yankowski wrote:
I use Squid as an HTTP accelerator in front of ZServer. What do
last-modified headers have to do with this discussion?
I thought that was how this thread started. I must have mis-read something.
I use a standard HTTP Cache Manager for all our caching needs - I have
yet t
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 11:09:57AM +0100, seb bacon wrote:
> I use squid, which doesn't require last-modified headers. I guess
> that's not an option for you, or you'd probably already be using it ;-)
> But in any case, I don't see why Shane's suggestion of uncommenting
> the last-modified lin
I think it's only been about two weeks, actually. But, yes, it will be
some time before 2.7 final is released. I expect another two or three
beta cycles before final, so possibly a month or maybe even two.
On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 11:13, Andrew Veitch wrote:
> Just wondering what the latest on Zope
Just wondering what the latest on Zope 2.7 is, it's been nearly a month
since the last release. We're looking forward to it, there's some changes
that will help us a lot but we don't want to deploy on a beta.
Andrew
--
Logical Progression Ltd, 20 Forth Street, Edinburgh EH1 3LH, UK
Tel: +44 (0)1
Hi all,
i have a little problem.
We have several Zope's running in our company.
Versions are 2.5.1,2.6.1,2.6.2. All are running on Redhat Linux.
All versions have the same problem, if i access them via pcgi and hit the Restart
button in the Control Panel then the server goes down.
If i do the same
Fred Yankowski wrote:
That makes sense. Is there a way to do that with the CMF 1.4
version of the "CPM"? One could, I suppose, test the names of the
FSDV folders in CPM predicates, but that seems a royal PITA. That's
why I'm making do with one-size-fits-all CPM policy for now.
Here's how I handl
John Barratt wrote:
> If you can't use catalog metadata as Seb suggests (eg. you are actually
> accessing many attributes, large values, etc.) and if indeeed memory is
> the problem (which seems likely) then you can ghostify the objects that
> were ghosts to begin with, and it will save memory (un
