"Phillip J. Eby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wow, Phillip! That was the best 'grounding' I have seen yet for
ZPatterns; in fact, I think it was exactly what I needed to let
me wrap my head around them. Thanks very much for posting this!
Tres.
--
=
Hmm. No takers the first time.
Quick review: python product, product instantiates a DTML method
and tries to assign it a proxy role. Proxy role gets assigned,
but a 'manager' account can no longer access the method, though
superuser can. Zope 2.1.6.
I played with the product some more, moving
On Wed, 7 Jun 2000, Petru Paler wrote:
> Comments ? Suggestions ?
>
> PS: a new DirectoryStorage release will be done today, with bugfixes and
> new features.
I'd love some sort of benchmarking tool for this (and posibly other
Storages). I guess the best way would a python script that uses url
OK, thought I would start playing with this...
Figured I would load a separate site to start with . It fails, claiming
it cant load oid. The site is orignally on 2.1.6, if it matters.
Then I copied the current Data,fs to foo.fs, and figured I'd give it a
try, being a new .fs and all. It complain
OK, been debugging the PTK problem with DTML Documents, as noted in the
PTK list. I thought I would jump over here to get some more
eyes/suggestions/etc. (Bug 81 in the PTK Tracker IIRC)
I have narrowed the problem down tothe following situation:
When in a Portal, a DTML Document calling a DTML
Jimmie Houchin wrote:
>
> From my naive understanding, would this help with the problem ZODB has
> with regard to folders with many objects? Would a person who is using
> DirectoryStorage not necessarily be required to partition their objects
> into an artificially derived hierarchical directory
Petru Paler writes:
> > >Glad you find it interesting :)
> >
> > Very. I think the line between FileSYstem and Database gets more blurred
> > every day.
>
> That's what Hans Reiser says all the time :)
>
> > Thanks for the heads up. I have to patch my kernel up to 2.2.11 first,
> > then
At 09:18 PM 6/8/00 +0800, Mike wrote:
>Hi,
>
>suppose I have two Specialists (A and B) written independently each
>other. I need to use certain set of services provided by one Specialist
>(A) in other (B). I see two way:
Let's take a specific example. Suppose I run a drop zone (a place where
peo
FYI - this is fixed in the Very Latest CVS :^)
Brian Lloyd[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Software Engineer 540.371.6909
Digital Creations http://www.digicool.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Dangoor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2000 10:59 AM
I've already submitted this to the collector, but I wanted to make sure that
I'm not the only one with this problem. Using the CVS Zope, if I create a
ZClass, I am unable to add a Property Sheet because of an error (missing
"__len__").
I find it hard to believe that I'm the first person to try to
Hi,
suppose I have two Specialists (A and B) written independently each
other. I need to use certain set of services provided by one Specialist
(A) in other (B). I see two way:
1) Create common proxy for A, implementing public subset of A's
interface and make B (and other possible clients) depen
> I don't have the two on comparable machines :-(
>
> Do you have a standard benchmark for comparing the relative performance
> FileStorage/DirectoryStorage on reiser fs?
Not yet. I have been using a script which just creates/retrieves
objects from the ODB but I guess something more serious
I don't have the two on comparable machines :-(
Do you have a standard benchmark for comparing the relative performance
FileStorage/DirectoryStorage on reiser fs?
> > M. I suspect NTs heavier file security checks will prove to be a
> > significant disadvantage - benchmarks to follow.
>
>
> M. I suspect NTs heavier file security checks will prove to be a
> significant disadvantage - benchmarks to follow.
If you do benchmarks, you should do them comparing
DirectoryStorage/NTFS to DirectoryStorage/reiserfs, because (at least at
mass object creation) DirectoryStorage is slower
> The version I sent to the list assumes a '/' directory
> separator. I'm
> releasing a fixed version (a snapshot of my working code) in
> a couple of
> seconds.
Thats fine on windows too (a backslash is only required on the standard
command line, but everywhere else a / is ok too)
> I
Note that this version (experimentally) uses a dbm database for storing
serials. If you don't have/don't want to use gdbm, replace all occurences
of gdbm with dbhash or dumbdbm. I didn't used anydbm because it has some
strange problems with my python installation :) (but it will be fixed
soon)
> > Hello all,
> >
> > You probably saw my yesterday post with the first alpha of
> >ReiserStorage.
>
> Woohoo!
>
> Id like to try this on NT with NTFS too (which has similar performance
> characteristics with big directories and small files). Do you think
> this is worth a try, or do
> From my naive understanding, would this help with the problem ZODB has
> with regard to folders with many objects? Would a person who is using
> DirectoryStorage not necessarily be required to partition their objects
> into an artificially derived hierarchical directory structure?
No, these
On Wed, 7 Jun 2000 18:00:31 +0300 (EEST), Petru Paler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> You probably saw my yesterday post with the first alpha of
>ReiserStorage.
Woohoo!
Id like to try this on NT with NTFS too (which has similar performance
characteristics with big directo
19 matches
Mail list logo
