[Zope-dev] Re: typo in HTTPResponse.py

2002-03-15 Thread Evan Simpson
Christian Theune wrote: > Hmm. Is it possible to implement some option to turn this off? I just checked in the ability to use HTTP_TRACEBACK_STYLE to control the appearance of tracebacks in non-debug mode errors: '' (default): Place it in an HTML comment 'none': Omit it 'plain': Include it as p

[Zope-dev] Zope crashes: Tim Peters reports potential problem

2002-03-15 Thread Dieter Maurer
Tim Peters reports on "comp.lang.python": > [Martin v. Loewis] > > The garbage collector runs while having the GIL, so it does not need > > to be thread-safe. > > There's still a vulnerability here: gc *assumes* the GIL is held when > _PyObject_GC_Malloc gets called, and doesn't verify tha

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: more on the segfault saga

2002-03-15 Thread Leonardo Rochael Almeida
On Fri, 2002-03-15 at 08:19, Martijn Jacobs wrote: > > Hello Leo, Matt, Brian, > > > I'm on it. Will send results when they're available. If anyone wants > > to talk to me during the period, I'll be on IRC. > > If you need any assistance for anything, I'm at your service > Which channel/s

Re: [Zope-dev] Modifying a menu

2002-03-15 Thread Lennart Regebro
> but gotta dive in and make some changes to this menu. It depends on what type of change you want to make. This menu does not exist in it's finished form anywhere in the code, but it it's contents are created each time you view it, and modified depending on several parameters. So modifying it is

[Zope-dev] RE: Object links/references

2002-03-15 Thread Brian Lloyd
> You told us that you will be refining Zope 2.6 plan. > ProposedFeatures table contains an " Implement links > (object references)" entry by Mario Valente. I've created > SoftLink proposal in ProposalsWiki . These works appear > related. We (Mario and me) discussed and decided that > we can

Re: [Zope-dev] Bug days

2002-03-15 Thread Paul Everitt
I don't think we can do the geographic coverage without making it too painful. We should split bug days in half; a few hours in the morning and a few hours in the afternoon. --Paul Brian Lloyd wrote: > Hi all - > > In an effort to better keep up with the collector, I'd like > to throw out

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: more on the segfault saga

2002-03-15 Thread Matthew T. Kromer
Hi Martijn, We're basically just trying to construct traps to try to identify a "smoking gun." The upside is, if it works, we'll be able to fix the bug very quickly. However, its based on assumptions about the exact nature of the bug -- so each trap I write essentially is making a hypothesis

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.6 planning - call for contributors!

2002-03-15 Thread Adam Manock
>FYI, everyone who's following this: I have hijacked >http://dev.zope.org/Wikis/DevSite/Proposals/InstallationAndConfiguration >for this purpose. :-) Awesome. Exactly how I'd like the default zope install to be structured. :-) Adam ___ Zope-Dev m

Re: [Zope-dev] Bug days

2002-03-15 Thread Adam Manock
> >Europe late afternoon = EST morning >How would 1700 UTC (GMT) be for most people? People generally asleep between 12am and 6am. Therefore the best time is logically 2am or so central Pacific time (affecting very few) This is corresponds to 2pm GMT, 9am US EST, etc Adam __

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: more on the segfault saga

2002-03-15 Thread Martijn Jacobs
Hello Leo, Matt, Brian, > I'm on it. Will send results when they're available. If anyone wants > to talk to me during the period, I'll be on IRC. If you need any assistance for anything, I'm at your service Which channel/server are you on IRC? Did somebody succeed reproducing the crash?

Re: [Zope-dev] Bug days

2002-03-15 Thread seb bacon
Brian Lloyd wrote: > Hi all - > > In an effort to better keep up with the collector, I'd like > to throw out the idea of doing periodic "bug days" (a la An excellent idea. > I'd like to hear what people think, as well as work out a few > logistics: > > - Given the wide geographic area tha