[Zope-dev] REAL WORLD!

2002-04-01 Thread zope-dev-admin
ÅóÓÑ£¬ÏòÄãÍƼöÒ»¸öÊ®·ÖÓÐȤµÄÍøÉϳåÀË׬Ǯ·½·¨£¬ÊÔÒ»ÊÔ°É£¡ http://www.cashfiesta.com/php/join.php?ref=cblxzy Ö»ÒªÉÏÍø¾Í¿ÉÔÚÏß׬Ǯ£¬ºÎÀÖ¶ø²»Îª£¡Ç¿ÁÒÍƼö£¡Ö»ÒªÔÚÏ߾ͼÆÊý£¬1Сʱ0.6ÃÀÔ²£¡ Ç¿ÁÒÍƼö£¡Ö»ÒªÔÚÏ߾ͼÆÊý£¬1Сʱ0.6ÃÀÔ²£¡ ÓÐÐËȤһ±ßÉÏÍøÒ»±ß׬ǮÂð£¿

[Zope-dev] Simplification via custom protocol handlers: cvs://server/project,zope://foo ?

2002-04-01 Thread Craeg K Strong
Hello: I am the author of the CVSFile product, available at http://www.zope.org/Members/arielpartners/CVSFile I am thinking about implementing a new design, and wanted to get some feedback from the list first (perhaps others have tried this approach?) Here is a description of our problem:

Re: [Zope-dev] Simplification via custom protocol handlers:cvs://server/project, zope://foo ?

2002-04-01 Thread R. David Murray
is bad. What happens when we switch to some other revision control tool (like clearcase, subversion, sourcesafe)? Either you have multiple classes like CVS-XSLTFile, Clearcase-XSLTFile, etc. or a single class that knows about every possible version control system. yuk. Clearly,

Re: [Zope-dev] ZClass Constructor Cleanup for 2.6

2002-04-01 Thread Casey Duncan
The current Zope cvs trunk now contains these changes. Check it out and let me know if you find any gotchas! -Casey Didier Georgieff wrote: On Wed, 2002-03-27 at 17:31, Casey Duncan wrote: ZClasses have been overlooked enough. Nobody has even bothered putting a ZCatalogPathAware available

Re: [Zope-dev] Simplification via custom protocol handlers: cvs://server/project,zope://foo ?

2002-04-01 Thread Dieter Maurer
Craeg K Strong writes: ... The Zope protocol handler idea is interesting, and I haven't thought this all the way through yet. Could dtml-var blat be thought of as referring to zope://blat where the Zope protocol is the default and therefore omitted? I do not think, this would be a

[Zope-dev] final patches

2002-04-01 Thread Leonardo Rochael Almeida
On Thu, 2002-03-28 at 15:33, Matthew T. Kromer wrote: [...] FYI, Pythonlabs thinks there is more than one bug involved. The relevant report at sourceforge is: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=105470aid=535905group_id=5470 That report marks the bug as closed and one

Catalogs, Imports, and Path Awareness (was Re: [Zope-dev] ZClassConstructor Cleanup for 2.6)

2002-04-01 Thread Jeffrey P Shell
On 3/30/02 5:55 AM, Didier Georgieff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 2002-03-27 at 17:31, Casey Duncan wrote: ZClasses have been overlooked enough. Nobody has even bothered putting a ZCatalogPathAware available for them... I've done that locally (changing __init__ and the the py but had

Re: Catalogs, Imports, and Path Awareness (was Re: [Zope-dev] ZClassConstructor Cleanup for 2.6)

2002-04-01 Thread R. David Murray
On Mon, 1 Apr 2002, Jeffrey P Shell wrote: If other people have come across this, I think finding a resolution to this would be a more-than-worthy 2.6 project. If I'm just smoking crack and it's only a ZPatterns/TransactionAgents behavior that I'm witnessing, then I'll just leave my huffing

[Zope-dev] FW: Catalogs, Imports, and Path Awareness (was Re: [Zope-dev]ZClass Constructor Cleanup for 2.6)

2002-04-01 Thread Jeffrey P Shell
On 4/1/02 5:59 PM, R. David Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 1 Apr 2002, Jeffrey P Shell wrote: If other people have come across this, I think finding a resolution to this would be a more-than-worthy 2.6 project. If I'm just smoking crack and it's only a ZPatterns/TransactionAgents

[Zope-dev] SQLite as a Light DB component for Zope and Python

2002-04-01 Thread William Trenker
I have noticed on the DB lists lately some concern about the future of Gadfly. I have been investigating a marvelous little open-source, no copyright, SQL engine called SQLite: An SQL Database Engine In A C Library. I am quite experienced with Python, reasonably experienced with Zope but a

Re: [Zope-dev] ZClass Constructor Cleanup for 2.6

2002-04-01 Thread Anthony Baxter
Casey Duncan wrote I don't think this is a big enough change to warrant a real proposal, so I'll shoot this out here: Does anyone see a problem with changing the default generated constructor method for ZClasses to a python script in Zope 2.6? +1. There's always some funniness in