[Zope-dev] Re: [Z3lab] Nuxeo supports Zope Corp announces

2005-06-16 Thread Jean-Marc Orliaguet
Eric Barroca wrote: > Hello, > > > Following the announces from Zope Corporation yesterday about their > willingness to create a Zope Foundation (that would manage > independently Zope 2 and Zope 3 projects) and to participate actively > in the Z3ECM project, I would like to express briefly Nux

[Zope-dev] Nuxeo supports Zope Corp announces

2005-06-16 Thread Eric Barroca
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, Following the announces from Zope Corporation yesterday about their willingness to create a Zope Foundation (that would manage independently Zope 2 and Zope 3 projects) and to participate actively in the Z3ECM project, I would like to e

Re: [Zope-dev] BTree vs dictionary

2005-06-16 Thread Tim Peters
[Yair Benita] > Now that I know how to use BTrees I grew fond of it and the features it > offers. Yup, they're very cool. > While the advantages of using BTrees are obvious when using it in a database > context, I was wondering if it makes sense to use it instead of a dictionary > routinely, just

Re: [Zope-dev] BTree vs dictionary

2005-06-16 Thread Andreas Jung
--On 16. Juni 2005 17:32:15 +0200 Yair Benita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Now that I know how to use BTrees I grew fond of it and the features it offers. While the advantages of using BTrees are obvious when using it in a database context, I was wondering if it makes sense to use it instead of

[Zope-dev] BTree vs dictionary

2005-06-16 Thread Yair Benita
Now that I know how to use BTrees I grew fond of it and the features it offers. While the advantages of using BTrees are obvious when using it in a database context, I was wondering if it makes sense to use it instead of a dictionary routinely, just so I can take advantage of commands such as t(mi

Re: [Zope-dev] Verbose security for Zope 2.8 or 2.9

2005-06-16 Thread Florent Guillaume
Shane Hathaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Florent Guillaume wrote: > > What is the dependency on the python implementation, is it just > > _embed_permission_in_roles ? Didn't you succeed in patching the C > > version too in some earlier versions of VerboseSecurity ? > > Currently, the C code ma