On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 19:57 -0400, Tres Seaver wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Roché Compaan wrote:
> > Hi there
> >
> > Are the current indexing solutions that we have in Zope 2 and 3 the best
> > that we can have? Is there any way to improve the amount of concurrent
On 9/17/07, Gustavo Niemeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 2. "Timezones in the form of EST5EDT or US/Eastern doesn't work.
> >
> > Both these can be avoided by keeping the old time and timezone
> > interpretation around.
>
> I'm not aware about that. In fact, I'm curious about what the problem
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Roché Compaan wrote:
> Hi there
>
> Are the current indexing solutions that we have in Zope 2 and 3 the best
> that we can have? Is there any way to improve the amount of concurrent
> indexing a field or text index can handle. The Zope 3 implementatio
(Sending reply to the list, since Gustavo doesn't seem to be subscribed.)
On 9/17/07, Gustavo Niemeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hey Lennart,
>
> > 1. Giving the timezone string 'GMT+3' meant that you got the timezone
> > GMT-3 back. This was done intentionally and I had some discussion with
Hi there
Are the current indexing solutions that we have in Zope 2 and 3 the best
that we can have? Is there any way to improve the amount of concurrent
indexing a field or text index can handle. The Zope 3 implementation
doesn't look significantly different to the Zope 2 one in that it still
uses
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Sun Sep 16 12:00:00 2007 UTC to Mon Sep 17 12:00:00 2007 UTC.
There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Unit Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.7 Python-2.3.6 : Linux
From: Zope Unit Tests
Date: Sun Sep 16 20:51:10 EDT 2007
URL
