Am 17.09.2008 um 01:57 schrieb Roger Ineichen:
[...]
Could this package be called ``zope.browser`` then?
+1 to this hot topic
I like the idea to have a pure interface package
for some basic (context, request) adapter components
called views, browser pages or contentprovider etc.
Hi, is
Hi ALL,
When will the next release of zope3 will be? will there be a zope3.4c2? By
the way i wish to know whether next release will include the latest release
of zope.sendmail which has TSL/SSL feature.
I have noticed that last release, zope3.4c01 was on 31 Jan 2008.
On 06.11.2008 10:31 Uhr, Jayarajan Jn wrote:
Hi ALL,
When will the next release of zope3 will be? will there be a zope3.4c2?
By the way i wish to know whether next release will include the latest
release of zope.sendmail which has TSL/SSL feature.
I have noticed that last release, zope3.4c01
Hello,
I've run into a misterious issue while evolving generations from an
old DB.
Quick fact is that it seems like a BTree kept an object reference to
an object which was deleted from it. I'll try to explain/dig into
below.
BTrees source is of revision 75706, running on win32, compiled with
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Wed Nov 5 12:00:00 2008 UTC to Thu Nov 6 12:00:00 2008 UTC.
There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Tests.
Test failures
-
Subject: FAILED (failures=2) : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.5 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Wed Nov 5 20:39:55 EST
Hi Adam
Adam GROSZER wrote:
Hello,
I've run into a misterious issue while evolving generations from an
old DB.
Quick fact is that it seems like a BTree kept an object reference to
an object which was deleted from it.
[snip]
Yes, the BTree implementations we use may keep a reference to a
Is there an event in Zope 3 indicating a Zope server shutdown?
Andreas
begin:vcard
fn:Andreas Jung
n:Jung;Andreas
org:ZOPYX Ltd. Co. KG
adr;quoted-printable:;;Charlottenstr. 37/1;T=C3=BCbingen;;72070;Germany
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:CEO
tel;work:+49-7071-793376
On Nov 6, 2008, at 8:14 AM, Jacob Holm wrote:
Hi Adam
Adam GROSZER wrote:
Hello,
I've run into a misterious issue while evolving generations from an
old DB.
Quick fact is that it seems like a BTree kept an object reference to
an object which was deleted from it.
[snip]
Yes, the
[Jim Fulton]
In particular, it might have a reference to the key in an internal
BTree node.
(I don't know this to be true, but I wouldn't be surprised if it was
true.)
It was true when I was working on BTrees ... here, from
On Nov 6, 2008, at 11:32 AM, Tim Peters wrote:
[Jim Fulton]
In particular, it might have a reference to the key in an internal
BTree node.
(I don't know this to be true, but I wouldn't be surprised if it was
true.)
It was true when I was working on BTrees ... here, from
Hello Jim,
Does this fit?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope3/+bug/294788
Thursday, November 6, 2008, 6:14:34 PM, you wrote:
JF On Nov 6, 2008, at 11:32 AM, Tim Peters wrote:
[Jim Fulton]
In particular, it might have a reference to the key in an internal
BTree node.
(I don't know this to be
On Nov 6, 2008, at 1:06 PM, Adam GROSZER wrote:
Hello Jim,
Does this fit?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope3/+bug/294788
Yup. Thanks!
Jim
--
Jim Fulton
Zope Corporation
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 17:32, Alan Runyan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree with Tres. A lot more can be done with Indexes and Catalog
without caching.
The most exiciting development in Catalog optimizations comes out
Jarn. Helge Tesdal (iirc) did a buncha work at a RDBMS company when
he
13 matches
Mail list logo
