On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Martin Aspeli wrote:
>> Martijn Faassen wrote:
>>> Hi there,
>>>
>>> I think we've had enough discussion to make a decision.
>>
>> I'm a little worried that neither Stephan Richter, nor Jim Fulton have
>> had much weight in on this. They see
Gary Poster wrote:
> I would think we would want to follow the pattern of the adapter_hooks in
> zope.interface.interface, including the C optimizations.
Speaking of adapter hooks: If I'm not completely mistaken, adapter hooks
know about exactly one object to be adapted. To follow the pattern of
Hi,
On 12/03/2009 06:41 PM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I think we've had enough discussion to make a decision. Hopefully
> everybody is at least reasonably happy with this:
>
> An "adapt()" method will be added to Interface. It takes the objects to
> adapt as *args, and optional but ex
Brian Sutherland wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 03:11:07PM -0700, Shane Hathaway wrote:
>> Godefroid Chapelle wrote:
>>> I tried to follow this discussion closely: however, I cannot say that I
>>> understand if doing multi-adaptation with IFoo(bar, baz, boo) has been
>>> rejected or postponed.
Thomas Lotze wrote:
[snip]
> I'd be happy to lead this effort, if you like to put it like that. I
> wouldn't want to take it out of Martijn's hands, though, unless he's happy
> with it as well, given that he's the one who started the discussion.
By all means take the lead on the implementation. :)
Martin Aspeli wrote:
> Martijn Faassen wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I think we've had enough discussion to make a decision.
>
> I'm a little worried that neither Stephan Richter, nor Jim Fulton have
> had much weight in on this. They seem like important stakeholders. :)
Stephan has chipped in on th
Godefroid Chapelle wrote:
[snip]
> I tried to follow this discussion closely: however, I cannot say that I
> understand if doing multi-adaptation with IFoo(bar, baz, boo) has been
> rejected or postponed.
Multi adaptation with IFoo(foo, bar) is off the agenda. Whether that
means a permanent rej
Thomas Lotze wrote:
[snip]
> How are we going to organise the work? Do you intend to sketch out a plan
> for action? Should everyone create their own branches and experiment for a
> while first?
I think you're the main volunteer we have to work on this, so I suggest
you try your stuff on a branch
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Thu Dec 3 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Fri Dec 4 12:00:00 2009 UTC.
There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Thu Dec 3 20:38:38 EST 2009
URL: http://
