Re: [Zope-dev] Decimal validation error.
Seems a plain vanilla install of bluebream validates decimals fine with zope.app.form. Does z3c.form validate decimal fields or is that delegated to zope.schema? On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Mats Nordgren wrote: > I have an interface with a decimal field. It validates fine for 1,2 and 3 > fractions but if I enter a decimal with 4 fractions I get validation error > "The entered value is not a valid decimal literal." > > I'm using the pypi release of bluebream and z3c.form 2.3.2. > > Mats > ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.12 and Globals.DevelopmentMode
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sylvain Viollon wrote: > On Sat, 06 Feb 2010 02:14:07 -0500 > Tres Seaver wrote: > >Hello, > >> There was never any guarantee that Globals would be fully popluated >> before the start of product initialization: third-party code needs to >> defer checking that flag at "import" time (which is the point of the >> pattern Hanno outlines). >> >> An even better pattern would probably be to avoid the Globals "dumping >> ground" altogether and use the configuration object directly: >> >> from App.config import getConfiguration >> config = getConfiguration() >> if config.debug_mode: >> >> > >As matter of fact I tried that. And it always returned False >(that's why I posted that mail at first). I have to review my setup, >to see if there is something wrong, before I can continue to argue. > >I am using buildout and plone.recipe.zope2instance. That sounds as though you grabbed the configuration "early" (before startup has loaded it from the config file / command line options). You *can't* to this at module scope, because your module may be imported before the initialization has been done. Tres. - -- === Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tsea...@palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design"http://palladion.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkty4icACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ4a/QCeIXRVUIg4ib7m0yOj2lWP21XI pMYAn0V7pQ7x0hVGn1eRXLAd1NfHuoh7 =EUxK -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] Decimal validation error.
I have an interface with a decimal field. It validates fine for 1,2 and 3 fractions but if I enter a decimal with 4 fractions I get validation error "The entered value is not a valid decimal literal." I'm using the pypi release of bluebream and z3c.form 2.3.2. Mats ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] No license distributed with sources
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2/10/10 15:53 , Lennart Regebro wrote: > On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 08:19, Marius Gedminas wrote: >> Well, technically I suppose we're all violating the law by not following >> the ZPL requirement of keeping the licence text next to the files it >> covers when we redistribute them. It's unlikely for the Zope Foundation >> to sue any of us, thankfully. > > Oh, you just wait, if I get elected to the board there is gonna be HELLFIRE! > > No, seriously, sticking a copy in each package as a part of the big > header update seems a good idea. +1 on that. Even if adding the file is inappropriate (e.g. because a license file already exists) the checkin will alert the respective package developers to the change and they can fix that if needed. jens -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkty1asACgkQRAx5nvEhZLLmkQCglk/A9Y2R2f+iF545K+ZgcNZt Wr8An2TycG6VII2yIYguAw3g5WSaLeHe =6Gm/ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] No license distributed with sources
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 08:19, Marius Gedminas wrote: > Well, technically I suppose we're all violating the law by not following > the ZPL requirement of keeping the licence text next to the files it > covers when we redistribute them. It's unlikely for the Zope Foundation > to sue any of us, thankfully. Oh, you just wait, if I get elected to the board there is gonna be HELLFIRE! No, seriously, sticking a copy in each package as a part of the big header update seems a good idea. -- Lennart Regebro: Python, Zope, Plone, Grok http://regebro.wordpress.com/ +33 661 58 14 64 ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 6 OK
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Tue Feb 9 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Wed Feb 10 12:00:00 2010 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Tests. Tests passed OK --- Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue Feb 9 20:36:42 EST 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-February/013539.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue Feb 9 20:38:42 EST 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-February/013540.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue Feb 9 20:40:42 EST 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-February/013541.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.6.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue Feb 9 20:42:42 EST 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-February/013542.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.6.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue Feb 9 20:44:42 EST 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-February/013543.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue Feb 9 20:46:42 EST 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-February/013544.html ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.12 and Globals.DevelopmentMode
On Sat, 06 Feb 2010 02:14:07 -0500 Tres Seaver wrote: Hello, > > There was never any guarantee that Globals would be fully popluated > before the start of product initialization: third-party code needs to > defer checking that flag at "import" time (which is the point of the > pattern Hanno outlines). > > An even better pattern would probably be to avoid the Globals "dumping > ground" altogether and use the configuration object directly: > > from App.config import getConfiguration > config = getConfiguration() > if config.debug_mode: > > As matter of fact I tried that. And it always returned False (that's why I posted that mail at first). I have to review my setup, to see if there is something wrong, before I can continue to argue. I am using buildout and plone.recipe.zope2instance. Regards, Sylvain, -- Sylvain Viollon -- Infrae t +31 10 243 7051 -- http://infrae.com Hoevestraat 10 3033GC Rotterdam -- The Netherlands ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
