Hi.
Are you using Products.ZSQLMethods or DC.Shared.ZRDB? Are you
interested in maintaining it?
Starting with Zope 2.13 these packages are no longer part of the Zope
2 distribution. The code has moved to its own project, as the core
Zope 2 developers haven't had a strong interest in it anymore.
On 07/09/2010 04:50 PM, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> I noticed that all three frameworks (BB, Grok, Zope2) have version
> pins for Paste, PasteDeploy and PasteScript. Does anyone object to
> including them into the ztk-versions.cfg under dependencies?
No objections from Grok.
Regards,
Martijn
___
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Christophe Combelles wrote:
> However, the 2.7 slaves don't send any alert to the zope-tests list. Should I
> enable this?
The winbot already sends reports for Python 2.7, so I'd say go ahead
and spam us :) More blame might get someone to fix those two last
zope.ap
Le 09/07/2010 21:04, Christophe Combelles a écrit :
> The afpy buildbots now all run a slave with Python 2.7 final
> http://buildbot.afpy.org/
However, the 2.7 slaves don't send any alert to the zope-tests list. Should I
enable this?
>
> Christophe
>
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 9:04 PM, Christophe Combelles wrote:
> The afpy buildbots now all run a slave with Python 2.7 final
> http://buildbot.afpy.org/
Yeah!
Jan-Jaap and Sebastien, could you update your buildouts as well?
Python 2.7 should run for the ZTK trunk, zc.buildout and Zope 2 trunk.
I'm
The afpy buildbots now all run a slave with Python 2.7 final
http://buildbot.afpy.org/
Christophe
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http
Le 09/07/2010 18:44, Hanno Schlichting a écrit :
> Hi.
>
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Christophe Combelles wrote:
>> http://svn.zope.org/zopetoolkit/trunk/ztk-versions.cfg?rev=114375&view=auto
>>
>> is there any reason why the versions pinning of the toolchain are in the
>> ztk-versions.cfg ?
Hi.
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Christophe Combelles wrote:
> http://svn.zope.org/zopetoolkit/trunk/ztk-versions.cfg?rev=114375&view=auto
>
> is there any reason why the versions pinning of the toolchain are in the
> ztk-versions.cfg ? Packages such as z3c.recipe.depgraph, mr.developer,
> z3
Hi,
http://svn.zope.org/zopetoolkit/trunk/ztk-versions.cfg?rev=114375&view=auto
is there any reason why the versions pinning of the toolchain are in the
ztk-versions.cfg ? Packages such as z3c.recipe.depgraph, mr.developer,
z3c.checkversions have nothing to do with the final frameworks nor the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Glick wrote:
> I am done (as far as I can tell) evaluating RestrictedPython to see if
> changes are needed to support Python 2.7. This is the first time I have
> done this, so would appreciate if someone else can look over my work to
> make sure
On Friday, July 09, 2010, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> I noticed that all three frameworks (BB, Grok, Zope2) have version
> pins for Paste, PasteDeploy and PasteScript. Does anyone object to
> including them into the ztk-versions.cfg under dependencies?
+1
Regards,
Stephan
--
Entrepreneur and Soft
Le 09/07/2010 16:50, Hanno Schlichting a écrit :
> Hi.
>
> I noticed that all three frameworks (BB, Grok, Zope2) have version
> pins for Paste, PasteDeploy and PasteScript. Does anyone object to
> including them into the ztk-versions.cfg under dependencies?
>
> It's currently:
>
> Paste = 1.7.4
> P
Hi.
I noticed that all three frameworks (BB, Grok, Zope2) have version
pins for Paste, PasteDeploy and PasteScript. Does anyone object to
including them into the ztk-versions.cfg under dependencies?
It's currently:
Paste = 1.7.4
PasteDeploy = 1.3.3
PasteScript = 1.7.3
Note that Paste 1.7.4 addr
On Thursday, July 08, 2010, David Glick wrote:
> I am done (as far as I can tell) evaluating RestrictedPython to see if
> changes are needed to support Python 2.7. This is the first time I have
> done this, so would appreciate if someone else can look over my work to
> make sure I'm not missing som
Hi David,
awesome work!
Sidnei or Stephan, can one of you comment on David's approach or offer a review?
Cheers,
Hanno
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 5:42 AM, David Glick wrote:
> I am done (as far as I can tell) evaluating RestrictedPython to see if
> changes are needed to support Python 2.7. This is
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 9:08 AM, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> I think zope.dublincore causes the breakage in some zope.app packages.
This one's a sticking point for a large application here as well (one where
we're trying to move to the ZTK as the base). I think I'm sticking to
zope.dublincore 3.6.
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
> [zope.traversing absolute URL behavior]
>
> I've applied the fix to zope.traversing and added a test as well. It's
> released as zope.traversing. I've also updated the ZTK to use this version.
Thanks!
> (initially I used checkversions to u
Hey,
[zope.traversing absolute URL behavior]
I've applied the fix to zope.traversing and added a test as well. It's
released as zope.traversing. I've also updated the ZTK to use this version.
(initially I used checkversions to update a few other packages too,
namely zope.dublincore, zope.index
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Thu Jul 8 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Fri Jul 9 12:00:00 2010 UTC.
There were 54 messages: 6 from Zope Tests, 3 from buildbot at
enfoldsystems.com, 4 from buildbot at pov.lt, 17 from buildbot at
winbot.zope.org, 11 from ccomb at free.fr, 1 from ct at
Hi all
> Betreff: Re: [Zope-dev] zope.traversing's ILocation behavior
>
>
> On Jul 8, 2010, at 11:04 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
> >
> > I propose the following adjustment:
> >
> > try:
> > container = context.__parent__
> > except AttributeError:
> > container = ILocation(contex
On 9 July 2010 16:12, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Martin Aspeli
> wrote:
>>> Ideally I'd love to add support for the permission attribute, as
>>> clearly people have been using it. But if there's nobody who can
>>> figure out how to do that, I'd at least like to cl
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
>> Ideally I'd love to add support for the permission attribute, as
>> clearly people have been using it. But if there's nobody who can
>> figure out how to do that, I'd at least like to clarify the add view
>> case.
>
> Why can't we just copy t
22 matches
Mail list logo
