Re: [Zope-dev] Help review #181754

2010-07-21 Thread Wichert Akkerman
On 2010-7-21 07:32, Wolfgang Schnerring wrote: * Wichert Akkermanwich...@wiggy.net [2010-07-20 19:28]: On 2010-7-20 18:15, Christian Theune wrote: At least, WRT this bug, I don't think it's a good idea to ask explicitly for bad requests to go to the application as the test layer should model

Re: [Zope-dev] Help review #181754

2010-07-21 Thread Christian Theune
On 07/21/2010 09:17 AM, Wichert Akkerman wrote: On 2010-7-21 07:32, Wolfgang Schnerring wrote: * Wichert Akkermanwich...@wiggy.net [2010-07-20 19:28]: On 2010-7-20 18:15, Christian Theune wrote: At least, WRT this bug, I don't think it's a good idea to ask explicitly for bad requests to go

[Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 48 OK, 10 Failed, 1 Unknown

2010-07-21 Thread Zope Tests Summarizer
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Tue Jul 20 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Wed Jul 21 12:00:00 2010 UTC. There were 59 messages: 6 from Zope Tests, 1 from buildbot at enfoldsystems.com, 4 from buildbot at pov.lt, 15 from buildbot at winbot.zope.org, 13 from ccomb at free.fr, 20 from

[Zope-dev] zope.hookable ported to Python 3

2010-07-21 Thread Lennart Regebro
I've ported zope.hookable too, but I don't need it until it's time to port zope.component (and I think the same goes for zope,security which I think is next if I remember correctly), so I'm not merging the branch yet. It's full if ugly Python 3 hacks, as it's a c-extension. Feel free to take a

Re: [Zope-dev] zope.testing / zope.testrunner path forward:

2010-07-21 Thread Lennart Regebro
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 06:28, Christian Theune c...@gocept.com wrote: I myself prefer having more releases. I like Marius' idea: 3.10 would be good for removing the test runner then 4.0 can be Py3 compatibility. OK, I'll merge and release 3.10 today or tomorrow or so. -- Lennart Regebro,

Re: [Zope-dev] zope.testing / zope.testrunner path forward:

2010-07-21 Thread Lennart Regebro
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 23:57, Marius Gedminas mar...@gedmin.as wrote: 1. Should there be BBB imports of zope.testrunner into zope.testing? We can do that to get a longer deprecation period, a couple of months isn't very long). *shrug* Nobody said YES! and since it actually requires that

Re: [Zope-dev] zope.testing / zope.testrunner path forward:

2010-07-21 Thread Stephan Richter
On Wednesday, July 21, 2010, Lennart Regebro wrote: Nobody said YES! and since it actually requires that zope.testing depends on zope.testrunner to be pracically useful, I think we'll skip it. I think nobody cares because everyone uses the test runner recipe. As long as that recipe works, we

Re: [Zope-dev] zope.testing / zope.testrunner path forward:

2010-07-21 Thread Jim Fulton
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com wrote: I'd like to put down some effort this week during the EuroPython sprint to go forward with zope.testing for Python 3. zope.testing 3.9.5 is already deprecating zope.testing.testrunner, but I need to remove it so that I

Re: [Zope-dev] zope.testing / zope.testrunner path forward:

2010-07-21 Thread Lennart Regebro
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 15:06, Jim Fulton j...@zope.com wrote: Do whatever is easiest for you.  One option would be to release as eggs for Python 3 only.  That way, you shouldn't be affecting Python 2 users. I've released 3.10.0 now, and will let that simmer a while. I'm on Europython so

Re: [Zope-dev] vocabularies missing wihtout zope.app.schema

2010-07-21 Thread Patrick Gerken
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 17:52, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote: On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Roger d...@projekt01.ch wrote: The zope.componentvocabulary package defines some basic vocabulary (factory) classes. Probably we should move the zope/app/schema/vocabulary.py to this

Re: [Zope-dev] vocabularies missing wihtout zope.app.schema

2010-07-21 Thread David Glick
On 7/21/10 6:19 PM, Patrick Gerken wrote: On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 17:52, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote: On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Roger d...@projekt01.ch wrote: The zope.componentvocabulary package defines some basic vocabulary (factory) classes. Probably we