Re: [Zope-dev] Stopping weekly meetings, moving towards sprints
Hi, On 12/21/2010 10:05 PM, Chris McDonough wrote: > Thanks for giving it a shot Christian! I always read the meeting notes, > if I didn't participate. Thanks, good to know that. :) -- Christian Theune · c...@gocept.com gocept gmbh & co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 0 · fax +49 345 1229889 1 Zope and Plone consulting and development ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 40 OK, 4 Failed
On 2010-12-22 11:13, Stephan Richter wrote: > On Tuesday, December 21, 2010, Wichert Akkerman wrote: >>> I am frequently getting bug reports from users. And it had 742 downloads >>> since July. That is not a huge number, but more than other packages that >>> are not part of the standard Plone/Zope 2/Bluebream dependency tree. >> >> If only those bugreports would get some response :) > > You having an outstanding one to me? :-) I have addressed all the ones in my > inbox in July. :-) I could find some time in the next days to do another round > of bug fixing. I added three tickets on launchpad in October :). A big problem for me appears to be that z3c.rml implements an older version of RML, so a lot of the directives in the RML documentation fail (at least of the few I wanted to use). And since z3c.rml silently ignores unsupported tags it took me quite some time to determine that the problem was not in my RML. Wichert. -- Wichert AkkermanIt is simple to make things. http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple. ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 40 OK, 4 Failed
On Tuesday, December 21, 2010, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > > I am frequently getting bug reports from users. And it had 742 downloads > > since July. That is not a huge number, but more than other packages that > > are not part of the standard Plone/Zope 2/Bluebream dependency tree. > > If only those bugreports would get some response :) You having an outstanding one to me? :-) I have addressed all the ones in my inbox in July. :-) I could find some time in the next days to do another round of bug fixing. Regards, Stephan -- Entrepreneur and Software Geek Google me. "Zope Stephan Richter" ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] One z3c.rml test failure on Linux -- bug in ReportLab?
On Tuesday, December 21, 2010, Marius Gedminas wrote: > So you're saying this is a bug in z3c.rml after all? It ends up not > using separate subprocesses for each test? It runs all tests twice, once with and once without the subprocess version. Regards, Stephan -- Entrepreneur and Software Geek Google me. "Zope Stephan Richter" ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] One z3c.rml test failure on Linux -- bug in ReportLab?
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 10:46:55PM -0500, Stephan Richter wrote: > On Monday, December 20, 2010, Marius Gedminas wrote: > > I'm not familiar with z3c.rml nor with ReportLab's form code, so I'd > > appreciate if people who wrote the test could help with the smaller > > reproducible example. > > That's not a bug, but a well-known issue with ReportLab. Once you generated > one document with ReportLab, you are not guaranteed a clean state, since > ReportLab uses module-global variables to keep track of state. That's ouch-y. I'm relying on the ability to produce multiple documents per process, and I've a system that does that in production. My documents do not use forms, though. Incidentally, I'm almost certain this bug was introduced into reportlab code in January 2010, by applying this patch: http://two.pairlist.net/pipermail/reportlab-users/2010-January/009216.html __InternalName__ is assigned only for objects that have __PDFObject__ set to True, and GLOBALRESOURCES is an instance of PDFPattern which didn't have that attribute earlier. I still intend to bring this up on the reportlab mailing list. > This is the > reason, Roger implemented running the renderer in a sub-process and all the > tests are run twice. So you're saying this is a bug in z3c.rml after all? It ends up not using separate subprocesses for each test? Marius Gedminas -- http://pov.lt/ -- Zope 3/BlueBream consulting and development signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 40 OK, 4 Failed
On 2010-12-22 00:22, Stephan Richter wrote: > On Tuesday, December 21, 2010, Tres Seaver wrote: >> I didn't look at the RML failures. I'm not even sure we should be >> running them, at least not every night, as I doubt the package is at all >> widely used (but I'm willing to be shouted down ;). > > I am frequently getting bug reports from users. And it had 742 downloads since > July. That is not a huge number, but more than other packages that are not > part of the standard Plone/Zope 2/Bluebream dependency tree. If only those bugreports would get some response :) Wichert. -- Wichert AkkermanIt is simple to make things. http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple. ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Stopping weekly meetings, moving towards sprints
Thanks for giving it a shot Christian! I always read the meeting notes, if I didn't participate. - C On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 19:46 +0100, Christian Theune wrote: > Hi, > > during my holidays I evaluated where I spend my time. I feel that the > weekly IRC meetings in their current form do not foster more development > or get stuff done on the maintenance side of things but keep rather > reiterating on the things we feel we should do. > > As they keep adding more maintenance burden on me (preparation and > post-mortem) without having much effect (it seemed there was some steam > initially but that dropped substantially) I'll seek ways to contribute > my time more efficiently. > > I had a very enjoyable face to face meeting with Hanno Schlichting and > Veit Schiele (of DZUG fame) today in which we figured that we'd like to > support creative action within the ZTK next year. We'd like to do so by > organizing a sprint each quarter over here in Germany. We're sketching > out details on how we want organization to work out over the next weeks > so that we find the topics that are interesting to people. > > Our current goal is to get together during March for 3 days, probably in > Berlin. > > Christian > ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] Stopping weekly meetings, moving towards sprints
Hi, during my holidays I evaluated where I spend my time. I feel that the weekly IRC meetings in their current form do not foster more development or get stuff done on the maintenance side of things but keep rather reiterating on the things we feel we should do. As they keep adding more maintenance burden on me (preparation and post-mortem) without having much effect (it seemed there was some steam initially but that dropped substantially) I'll seek ways to contribute my time more efficiently. I had a very enjoyable face to face meeting with Hanno Schlichting and Veit Schiele (of DZUG fame) today in which we figured that we'd like to support creative action within the ZTK next year. We'd like to do so by organizing a sprint each quarter over here in Germany. We're sketching out details on how we want organization to work out over the next weeks so that we find the topics that are interesting to people. Our current goal is to get together during March for 3 days, probably in Berlin. Christian -- Christian Theune · c...@gocept.com gocept gmbh & co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 0 · fax +49 345 1229889 1 Zope and Plone consulting and development ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 40 OK, 4 Failed
On Tuesday, December 21, 2010, Tres Seaver wrote: > I didn't look at the RML failures. I'm not even sure we should be > running them, at least not every night, as I doubt the package is at all > widely used (but I'm willing to be shouted down ;). I am frequently getting bug reports from users. And it had 742 downloads since July. That is not a huge number, but more than other packages that are not part of the standard Plone/Zope 2/Bluebream dependency tree. Regards, Stephan -- Entrepreneur and Software Geek Google me. "Zope Stephan Richter" ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 40 OK, 4 Failed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Yay, getting closer to green. Marius, thank you very much for your efforts over the past week! > Subject: FAILED : winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win64 > From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org > Date: Mon Dec 20 15:30:02 EST 2010 > URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-December/027135.html This one looks like a build failure:: - - %< - 'bin\test-ztk.exe' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file. - - %< - > Subject: FAILED : winbot / ztk_10 py_244_win32 > From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org > Date: Mon Dec 20 15:58:39 EST 2010 > URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-December/027139.html The failure here looks like it would be easier to diagnose if we released a zope.testing 3.9.6, to include Marius' fix adding NDIFF support to the (goofy) doctest. The error is in layer teardown, deep inside the subprocess module. I'm tempted to bump the code to skip this test altogether under Python 2.4. BTW, why are we running the tests every night against the released eggs of ZTK 1.0, rather than against the corresponding SVN branches? > Subject: FAILED : winbot / z3c.rml_py_265_32 > From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org > Date: Mon Dec 20 23:05:58 EST 2010 > URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-December/027166.html > > Subject: FAILED : winbot / z3c.rml_py_265_32 > From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org > Date: Mon Dec 20 23:55:02 EST 2010 > URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-December/027167.html I didn't look at the RML failures. I'm not even sure we should be running them, at least not every night, as I doubt the package is at all widely used (but I'm willing to be shouted down ;). Tres. - -- === Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tsea...@palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design"http://palladion.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk0QyaMACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ612QCgjnhjBhLsJbFbpTA0w9EDPNuB L2AAnivcVBVytbOERRIEcjFrhMBwBLBS =8vGs -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 40 OK, 4 Failed
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Mon Dec 20 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Tue Dec 21 12:00:00 2010 UTC. There were 44 messages: 8 from Zope Tests, 4 from buildbot at pov.lt, 21 from buildbot at winbot.zope.org, 11 from ccomb at free.fr. Test failures - Subject: FAILED : winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win64 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Mon Dec 20 15:30:02 EST 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-December/027135.html Subject: FAILED : winbot / ztk_10 py_244_win32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Mon Dec 20 15:58:39 EST 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-December/027139.html Subject: FAILED : winbot / z3c.rml_py_265_32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Mon Dec 20 23:05:58 EST 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-December/027166.html Subject: FAILED : winbot / z3c.rml_py_265_32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Mon Dec 20 23:55:02 EST 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-December/027167.html Tests passed OK --- Subject: OK : winbot / ztk_dev py_254_win32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Mon Dec 20 15:19:11 EST 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-December/027134.html Subject: OK : winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Mon Dec 20 15:28:40 EST 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-December/027137.html Subject: OK : winbot / ztk_dev py_270_win32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Mon Dec 20 15:38:40 EST 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-December/027136.html Subject: OK : winbot / ztk_dev py_270_win64 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Mon Dec 20 15:48:07 EST 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-December/027138.html Subject: OK : winbot / ztk_10 py_254_win32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Mon Dec 20 16:07:21 EST 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-December/027140.html Subject: OK : winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Mon Dec 20 16:15:40 EST 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-December/027141.html Subject: OK : winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win64 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Mon Dec 20 16:24:05 EST 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-December/027142.html Subject: OK : winbot / zc_buildout_dev py_254_win32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Mon Dec 20 16:35:25 EST 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-December/027143.html Subject: OK : winbot / zc_buildout_dev py_265_win32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Mon Dec 20 16:46:51 EST 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-December/027144.html Subject: OK : winbot / zc_buildout_dev py_265_win64 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Mon Dec 20 16:58:05 EST 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-December/027145.html Subject: OK : winbot / zc_buildout_dev py_270_win32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Mon Dec 20 17:09:47 EST 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-December/027146.html Subject: OK : winbot / zc_buildout_dev py_270_win64 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Mon Dec 20 17:21:11 EST 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-December/027147.html Subject: OK : winbot / ZODB_dev py_254_win32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Mon Dec 20 18:16:58 EST 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-December/027148.html Subject: OK : winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Mon Dec 20 19:13:10 EST 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-December/027149.html Subject: OK : ZTK 1.0 / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit From: ccomb at free.fr Date: Mon Dec 20 19:49:46 EST 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-December/027150.html Subject: OK : ZTK 1.0 / Python2.6.5 Linux 64bit From: ccomb at free.fr Date: Mon Dec 20 19:50:20 EST 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-December/027151.html Subject: OK : ZTK 1.0 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit From: ccomb at free.fr Date: Mon Dec 20 19:50:33 EST 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-December/027152.html Subject: OK : winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win64 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Mon Dec 20 20:08:48 EST 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-December/027153.html Subject: OK : winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Mon Dec 20 21:04:18 EST 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-December/027154.html Subject: OK : Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-64bit-linux From: buildbot at pov.lt Date: Mon Dec 20 21:13:32 EST 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-December/027155.html Subject: OK : winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win64 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Mon Dec 20 21:59:51 EST 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010
