-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/29/2012 09:00 PM, Zope tests summarizer wrote:
> Non-OK results --
>
> [1]FAILED ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit
> https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063677.html
Very odd:
> Develop:
> '/home/ccomb/ztk1.
This is the summary for test reports received on the
zope-tests list between 2012-05-28 00:00:00 UTC and 2012-05-29 00:00:00 UTC:
See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds.
An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our
buildbot documentation:
http://docs.zope.org/
Hi Uli,
Am 29.05.2012, 13:44 Uhr, schrieb Uli Fouquet :
Hi there,
As Christopher Lozinski pointed out, there seem to be usecases where
people want to use single zope.app packages without zope.app.zcmlfiles
and the whole bunch of zope.app packages it pulls in.
I think this is a non-usecase. zo
Hi there,
As Christopher Lozinski pointed out, there seem to be usecases where
people want to use single zope.app packages without zope.app.zcmlfiles
and the whole bunch of zope.app packages it pulls in.
Would it make sense for these packages to also register ZMI related
stuff only if some condit
Hi Christopher,
On Tue, 29 May 2012 06:05:57 -0500 Christopher Lozinski wrote:
> On 5/28/12 7:22 AM, Uli Fouquet wrote:
>> It's at least interesting to find other non-zope.app packages that
> register zmi_views components. I think these could/should be fixed as
> well. I would do that, if people
On 5/28/12 7:22 AM, Uli Fouquet wrote:
> It's at least interesting to find other non-zope.app packages that
register zmi_views components. I think these could/should be fixed as
well. I would do that, if people tell me what packages there are.
Here you go.
zope.app.dtmlpage-3.5.0-py2.6.egg
Thank
