At 04:08 PM 12/10/01 +, Tony McDonald wrote:
>On 10/12/01 2:54 pm, "Phillip J. Eby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure if this is taken into consideration in your work so far/future
> > plans... but just in case you were unaware, it is not necessary for you to
> > persistently stor
Excellent analysis, many thanks Sean! This is much-needed info for
people whom are attempting to scale.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 10:36 PM
Subject: [Zope-dev] 100k+ objects, or...Improving Pe
I'm not sure if this is taken into consideration in your work so far/future
plans... but just in case you were unaware, it is not necessary for you to
persistently store objects in the ZODB that you intend to index in a
ZCatalog. All that is required is that the object to be cataloged is
acc
Interesting FYI for those looking to support lots of cataloged objects in
ZODB and Zope (Chris W., et al)... I'm working on a project to put ~350k
Cataloged objects (customer database) in a single BTreeFolder-derived
container; these objects are 'proxy' objects which each expose a single
record in
