Re: [Zope-dev] Fw: [Exuserfolder-devel] Zope 2.5b1 release

2001-11-29 Thread Chris Withers
Dario Lopez-Kästen wrote: Anyway. In case you were wondering what the previous email meant, there's the actual meaning d8) I'm sure Andy's got a point, but we haven't got the context of those points. Is he complaining about the change in UserFolder API in Zope 2.5? cheers, Chris

Re: [Zope-dev] Fw: [Exuserfolder-devel] Zope 2.5b1 release

2001-11-29 Thread Paul Everitt
Yikes, it was pointed out to me that I typed amk instead of akm. Though I knew it was Andrew Milton and not Andrew Kuchling, I mixed up the letters. (In fact, as I was typing it, I was thinking wow, that looks like Andrew Kuchling's monogram.) --Paul Paul Everitt wrote: Whew, that

Re: [Zope-dev] Fw: [Exuserfolder-devel] Zope 2.5b1 release

2001-11-29 Thread Steve Alexander
A K Milton wrote: a) The change to manage_* seems to be completely arbitrary, since we already had _do* methods that meant you didn't have to call manage_users with fake submit buttons. So what is the point of having manage_ ? They were added in response to this fishbowl proposal:

Re: [Zope-dev] Fw: [Exuserfolder-devel] Zope 2.5b1 release

2001-11-29 Thread Steve Alexander
Steve Alexander wrote: In summary: I want to make sure that things are no worse in Zope 2.5 final than in Zope 2.5. Any breakage caused by this API change is a bug, and needs to be sorted out by Zope 2.5 final. That should have read: I want to make sure that the user management

RE: [Zope-dev] Fw: [Exuserfolder-devel] Zope 2.5b1 release

2001-11-29 Thread Brian Lloyd
a) The change to manage_* seems to be completely arbitrary, since we already had _do* methods that meant you didn't have to call manage_users with fake submit buttons. So what is the point of having manage_ ? They were added in response to this fishbowl proposal: