On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 03:32:21PM -0400, Shane Hathaway wrote:
> Florent Guillaume wrote:
> >Jim Penny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>>Are you referring to what I call "magic boolean attributes" ?
> >>>
> >>>http://lists.zope.org/pipermail/zpt/2002-March/003013.html
> >>
> >>Yes, thanks very
Shane Hathaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm pretty sure it's permanent, only undocumented.
>
> Florent, do you have committer privileges? You can certainly check in
> documentation of this behavior. You can also add a comment to the Zope
> book.
>
> http://www.zope.org/Documentation/Z
Florent Guillaume wrote:
> Jim Penny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>>Are you referring to what I call "magic boolean attributes" ?
>>>
>>>http://lists.zope.org/pipermail/zpt/2002-March/003013.html
>>
>>Yes, thanks very much, this is very helpful. I see that you could find
>>no documentation on
Jim Penny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Are you referring to what I call "magic boolean attributes" ?
> >
> > http://lists.zope.org/pipermail/zpt/2002-March/003013.html
>
> Yes, thanks very much, this is very helpful. I see that you could find
> no documentation on this, and got no reply. Is
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 02:55:23PM +, Florent Guillaume wrote:
> Jim Penny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I also have not found a convention that I am comfortable with on
> > handling check-boxes and radio buttons in error processing. But I
> > expect to!
>
> Are you referring to what I cal
Jim Penny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I also have not found a convention that I am comfortable with on
> handling check-boxes and radio buttons in error processing. But I
> expect to!
Are you referring to what I call "magic boolean attributes" ?
http://lists.zope.org/pipermail/zpt/2002-March/
Jim Penny wrote:
> I have also said that, while ZPT is not as warty as DTML, ZPT looks,
> on the surface, to be pretty ugly. I have said that there are three
> specific things I dislike about ZPT -- 0) lots of things have changed
> spelling again -- request v. REQUEST, here v. context v. contain
Jim Penny wrote:
>
> > ...can also be written as:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> Interesting. I seem to remember this from the Wiki's, is it documented
> anywhere else? This really seems like Chapter 5 material.
No idea, but it definitely should be...
> > >define="species fish/sp
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 11:53:47AM +0100, Chris Withers wrote:
> Jim Penny wrote:
> >
> > on the surface, to be pretty ugly. I have said that there are three
> > specific things I dislike about ZPT -- 0) lots of things have changed
> > spelling again -- request v. REQUEST, here v. context v. co
Jim Penny wrote:
>
> on the surface, to be pretty ugly. I have said that there are three
> specific things I dislike about ZPT -- 0) lots of things have changed
> spelling again -- request v. REQUEST, here v. context v. container v.
> this v. ?
Yeah, there was absolutely no need for this and
Tim Hoffman wrote:
>
> In addition event handlers in html ie onClick onBlur etc
> are all order independant.
>
> now adding tal: attributes that where order dependant would seem
> to fly in the face of that convention. (Admittedely there are probably
> no strange dependancies that could be intro
11 matches
Mail list logo
