Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 17:23, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
PyPI won't work for non-eggified products.
Right, so they need to be eggified then, which is a Good Thing. :)
I'm not saying they should be moved *now*. Just in the long run. If
the product is
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 10:16, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote:
Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 17:23, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
PyPI won't work for non-eggified products.
Right, so they need to be eggified then, which is a Good Thing. :)
I'm not
Lennart Regebro wrote:
The alternative is to make a new products directory on zope.org, which
is of course completely possible.
Well, I know what Andreas is planning to do is moving the whole thing to
old.zope.org and then using rewrite rules to redirect any 404's from
www.zope.org to there.
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 15:21, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote:
Sure. But I don't really see it as necessary to keep old.zope.org
around forever and ever.
Some people do, and doing that means they're happy, so I'm happy :-)
Fair enough. The correct path is I guess as always that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 15:21, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote:
Sure. But I don't really see it as necessary to keep old.zope.org
around forever and ever.
Some people do, and doing that means they're happy, so I'm
Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
Some people do, and doing that means they're happy, so I'm happy :-)
Fair enough. The correct path is I guess as always that those who want
to keep it get to be responsible for maintaining it. Problem solved.
:)
I won't support anything called 'old.zope.org'.
I
