hi Philip ...
> >so for a database app that handles multiple tables
> >it isnt useful to handle with a FwCS.
>
> Um, not necessarily. You can create regular Folders under the FwCS if you
> want to keep them seperate. You can even use BTreeFolders or other
> ObjectManagers, if you like. All tha
At 02:49 PM 12/14/00 +0100, Ulrich Eck wrote:
>
>after a while I think I got it now.
>
>I use a FcWS as a Folder like usual in Zope and if i create an object
>of a type which is "customized" certain attributes will be set through
>the customizer.
Yes.
>so for a database app that handles multip
>
> >I'm searching for something that handles a newItem(,key)
function
> >that is provided
> >from the FwCS who decides which object-type is created and gets those
> >attributes from the customizer
>
> Just use the normal Zope "add list" to create one manually, or call the
> appropriate constructo
>
> Not necessary. If you retrieve your DataSkin as an attribute of its
> container, the DataSkin __of__ method will automatically find and bind the
> DataManager (assuming you're not using some class that overrides __of__).
>
ok i've gone all through the source searching for a method
to get an
At 06:31 PM 12/13/00 +0100, Ulrich Eck wrote:
>after one more day of source-code-reading i got that far:
>
>When I want to use a Folder /w Customizer (FwCS) I cannot/don't need to use
>Specialists.
Not to store your objects, no. You can still use Specialists to
concentrate search methods, constr
after one more day of source-code-reading i got that far:
When I want to use a Folder /w Customizer (FwCS) I cannot/don't need to use
Specialists.
i create a FwCS and put my 'Framework' in it.
if i want to access (get/new) an object handled by a customizer
i can ask FwCS._getDataManagerFor(clien
At 07:23 PM 12/12/00 +0100, Ulrich Eck wrote:
>
>I can deal arround that if i reget the DSO from the specialist in every
>function which deals with DSO's.
This is the correct way to do it if you are using Specialists rather than
Folder w/Customization Support.
>
>is there a better way to
>
>a) t
