Am 15.05.2009 um 05:32 schrieb Chris McDonough:
Log message for revision 99961:
- Remove a dependency on ``zope.container.contained.Contained``
(this is a dumb base class that defines __parent__ and __name__
as None and declares that the class implements IContained).
What's the reason
On 5/15/09 2:46 AM, Michael Howitz wrote:
Am 15.05.2009 um 05:32 schrieb Chris McDonough:
Log message for revision 99961:
- Remove a dependency on ``zope.container.contained.Contained``
(this is a dumb base class that defines __parent__ and __name__
as None and declares that the class
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 2:57 AM, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote:
It's a partial step towards getting rid of a dependency that zope.intid has on
zope.container. I'm thinking that maybe that IContained interface belongs in
some other package (e.g. maybe zope.contained). That Container
Chris McDonough wrote:
On 5/15/09 2:46 AM, Michael Howitz wrote:
Am 15.05.2009 um 05:32 schrieb Chris McDonough:
Log message for revision 99961:
- Remove a dependency on ``zope.container.contained.Contained``
(this is a dumb base class that defines __parent__ and __name__
as None and
Fred Drake wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 2:57 AM, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote:
It's a partial step towards getting rid of a dependency that zope.intid has
on
zope.container. I'm thinking that maybe that IContained interface belongs in
some other package (e.g. maybe
On Friday 15 May 2009, Fred Drake wrote:
Keeping the dependency graph clean is great, and there's plenty to do
there. But there's also something to be said about being able to keep
a substantial portion of it in your head. The cleanliness of the
graph isn't so important if most users still
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Friday 15 May 2009, Fred Drake wrote:
Keeping the dependency graph clean is great, and there's plenty to do
there. But there's also something to be said about being able to keep
a substantial portion of it in your head. The cleanliness of the
graph isn't so
On 5/15/09 6:27 AM, Fred Drake wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 2:57 AM, Chris McDonoughchr...@plope.com wrote:
It's a partial step towards getting rid of a dependency that zope.intid has
on
zope.container. I'm thinking that maybe that IContained interface belongs in
some other package (e.g.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martijn Faassen wrote:
We might consider moving IContained to zope.location - it just
subclasses from ILocation after all and doesn't add anything besides
being a marker interface. zope.intid already depends on zope.location.
The Contained
