Re: [Zope-dev] [dev] five.localsitemanager: dependencies

2009-02-15 Thread Hanno Schlichting
[...] five.localsitemanger [...] Tres Seaver wrote: > Given that package's job in life, I strongly doubt that we need to worry > about anybody using it outside of a Zope2 app. In fact, I think it > might be a good idea just to fold the package back into Zope2 (I don't > recall why it ever shipped

Re: [Zope-dev] [dev] five.localsitemanager: dependencies

2009-02-15 Thread yuppie
Tres Seaver wrote: > As I said earlier: five.localsitemanager should just be made part of > the Zope2 trunk: it is tightly-coupled to Zope2, and its presence as a > separate pacakge is just confusing and error-prone. +1 ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-

Re: [Zope-dev] [dev] five.localsitemanager: dependencies

2009-02-15 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hanno Schlichting wrote: > Tres Seaver wrote: >> Charlie Clark wrote: >>> Am 12.02.2009 um 14:45 schrieb yuppie: install_requires=[ 'setuptools', 'Zope2 >= 2.12.dev', ], Is that the right way to

Re: [Zope-dev] [dev] five.localsitemanager: dependencies

2009-02-15 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Tres Seaver wrote: > Charlie Clark wrote: >> Am 12.02.2009 um 14:45 schrieb yuppie: > >>> install_requires=[ >>> 'setuptools', >>> 'Zope2 >= 2.12.dev', >>> ], >>> >>> Is that the right way to resolve that issue? Could it cause any >>> trouble >>> if I would check in t

Re: [Zope-dev] [dev] five.localsitemanager: dependencies

2009-02-14 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Charlie Clark wrote: > Am 12.02.2009 um 14:45 schrieb yuppie: > >> install_requires=[ >> 'setuptools', >> 'Zope2 >= 2.12.dev', >> ], >> >> Is that the right way to resolve that issue? Could it cause any >> trouble >> if I