Lennart Regebro wrote:
This means that we need more bugdays. A typical bugday squishes a whole
bunch of bugs. They bugs will be harder to squish the more bugdays we have,
since the easy one will be squished first, but no matter.
Whatever happened to the plan to have a monthly bug day on the last m
I don't think we can do the geographic coverage without making it too
painful. We should split bug days in half; a few hours in the morning
and a few hours in the afternoon.
--Paul
Brian Lloyd wrote:
> Hi all -
>
> In an effort to better keep up with the collector, I'd like
> to throw out
>
>Europe late afternoon = EST morning
>How would 1700 UTC (GMT) be for most people?
People generally asleep between 12am and 6am.
Therefore the best time is logically 2am or so central Pacific time
(affecting very few)
This is corresponds to 2pm GMT, 9am US EST, etc
Adam
__
Brian Lloyd wrote:
> Hi all -
>
> In an effort to better keep up with the collector, I'd like
> to throw out the idea of doing periodic "bug days" (a la
An excellent idea.
> I'd like to hear what people think, as well as work out a few
> logistics:
>
> - Given the wide geographic area tha
Brian Lloyd wrote:
> In an effort to better keep up with the collector, I'd like
> to throw out the idea of doing periodic "bug days" (a la
> the mozilla bug days), where Zope geeks and committers would
> get together on IRC and spend a few hours knocking out issues.
Yes, this would be *very*
Hi all -
In an effort to better keep up with the collector, I'd like
to throw out the idea of doing periodic "bug days" (a la
the mozilla bug days), where Zope geeks and committers would
get together on IRC and spend a few hours knocking out issues.
I've drafted a preliminary bug day manifest