On 3 Sep 2000, at 13:33, Dieter Maurer wrote:
> One solution would be to use a valid (special) date as default
> value and test against it in the body.
>
I don't like this "solution" because the end-user has to know what the
special date is, it looks ugly on the form and it still does *not*
Brad Clements writes:
> One thing that has been bothering me is that I can't easily test my
> ZSQL Methods if they accept a date type unless I completely fill all the
> date arg types.
>
> For example, if the sqlmethod has argument type
> startdate:date=''
>
>
> and in the body I
Brad Clements wrote:
> One thing that has been bothering me is that I can't easily test my
> ZSQL Methods if they accept a date type unless I completely fill all the
> date arg types.
>
> For example, if the sqlmethod has argument type
> startdate:date=''
>
>
> and in the body I have
>
One thing that has been bothering me is that I can't easily test my
ZSQL Methods if they accept a date type unless I completely fill all the
date arg types.
For example, if the sqlmethod has argument type
startdate:date=''
and in the body I have
...
When i use the test form, I can't lea
