=?iso-8859-1?Q?Dario=5FLopez-K=E4sten?= writes:
I am making a product using the Interface approach described in the ZDG.
As I understand it, Interfaces should expose all methods that provide
funtionality for my product, with the possible exception of internal methods
used as utility methods in the class itself. Is this correct?
You could have different interfaces, targeting different
audiences: TTW interfaces, scripting interfaces, programming interfaces.
Apart from using security declarations, I want to make some of the methods
available thru the web (TTW), and some of the methods not publishable TTW.
In order to be able to publish a method TTW, they need to have a docstring,
right?
There is a project proposal to eliminate this DocString abuse
Now, in my interface defintion I want to provide doc-strings for all methods
that are exposed (the interface), but not all them are to be publishable
TTW. Can I achieve this by using docstrings for my methods in the Interface,
but not in the Implementation, or do I need to omit the doc-string in both
the Interface and the Implementation?
It should be enough to omit the doc string from the implementation.
Dieter
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
