On Tuesday 25 August 2009, Martijn Faassen wrote:
> > We can use such a list to extract more information from included
> > packages. For example, I have a script to extract all CHANGES.txt entries
> > in comparison to an older KGS version.
>
> Ah, nice use case. In fact I also have a script that pa
Stephan Richter wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 August 2009, Jim Fulton wrote:
>> I'm not sure why this all has to be computer readable. What is the
>> use case for computer readable knowledge of whether a package is in
>> the kgs or just used to test it? What is the need for computer
>> readable inform
Jim Fulton wrote:
>> I do think we need a computer readable system that includes information
>> like this:
>>
>> * whether a project is in a KGS (such as for the ZTK)
>>
>> * whether a project is used to test a KGS (a package not in the ZTK but
>> used to test whether changes don't induce breakage,
On Wednesday 12 August 2009, Jim Fulton wrote:
> I'm not sure why this all has to be computer readable. What is the
> use case for computer readable knowledge of whether a package is in
> the kgs or just used to test it? What is the need for computer
> readable information about where the package
* Jim Fulton [2009-08-12 20:56]:
> This seems heavier than needed. Also, if someone extends this,
> they're going to get an awful lot of sections that might have names
> that conflict with names in their buildout. I do like the fact that
> the versions section is reusable. :)
>
> Here's an alter
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 7:36 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
> ...
>> - The versions specified in the controlled-packages.cfg don't seem to
>> be honored except for the package being tested. For example,
>> ZODB3-3.9.0b2 is used for test-kgs-ZODB3, but 3
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 7:07 AM, Wolfgang Schnerring wrote:
> * Jim Fulton [2009-08-12 11:52]:
>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 2:31 AM, Wolfgang Schnerring wrote:
>>>* Jim Fulton [2009-08-12 01:36]:
In playing with this today, I'm inclined to think that it would be
simpler to use a list of p
* Jim Fulton [2009-08-12 11:52]:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 2:31 AM, Wolfgang Schnerring wrote:
>>* Jim Fulton [2009-08-12 01:36]:
>>> In playing with this today, I'm inclined to think that it would be
>>> simpler to use a list of packages in an option to specify the packages
>>> to be tested and
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 2:31 AM, Wolfgang Schnerring wrote:
> * Jim Fulton [2009-08-12 01:36]:
>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
>>> - The versions specified in the controlled-packages.cfg don't seem to
>>> be honored except for the package being tested. For example,
>>> ZODB3-
* Jim Fulton [2009-08-12 01:36]:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
>> - The versions specified in the controlled-packages.cfg don't seem to
>> be honored except for the package being tested. For example,
>> ZODB3-3.9.0b2 is used for test-kgs-ZODB3, but 3.9.0b5 is used for
>> eve
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
...
> - The versions specified in the controlled-packages.cfg don't seem to
> be honored except for the package being tested. For example,
> ZODB3-3.9.0b2 is used for test-kgs-ZODB3, but 3.9.0b5 is used for
> everything else. Fortunately, it ap
2009/8/3 Fabio Tranchitella :
> Hi,
Hi,
I've added zope-dev. I hope you don't mind.
>
> * 2009-08-03 08:59, Christian Theune wrote:
>> Cool! Thanks for helping out! I should be online most of the time and
>> I'd be happy to answer questions.
>
> Tonight I spent some time working on this, and I w
12 matches
Mail list logo
