On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 09:20:27PM +0100, Dieter Maurer wrote:
Timothy Selivanow wrote at 2008-3-25 17:12 -0700:
...
Now when I say rip out, I don't mean repackage (make a sub RPM), I
mean remove from the RPM that I am making. I don't want to provide a
new Docutils.
That Zope ships with
--On 27. März 2008 20:42:50 +0200 Marius Gedminas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 09:20:27PM +0100, Dieter Maurer wrote:
Timothy Selivanow wrote at 2008-3-25 17:12 -0700:
...
Now when I say rip out, I don't mean repackage (make a sub RPM), I
mean remove from the RPM that
On Mar 26, 2008, at 01:12 , Timothy Selivanow wrote:
I would rather have a package that upstream approves of and
participates
in, than blindly create it in a silo not caring. It never turns out
well in the long run with the latter.
You may be fighting windmills here. Previous attempts at
Timothy Selivanow wrote at 2008-3-25 17:12 -0700:
...
Now when I say rip out, I don't mean repackage (make a sub RPM), I
mean remove from the RPM that I am making. I don't want to provide a
new Docutils.
That Zope ships with its own Docutils comes from the fact
that the standard one has a big
On Sat, 2008-03-22 at 08:05 +0100, Andreas Jung wrote:
In general we want to get rid of 3rd-party packages we don't want to
maintain on our own.
That's perfectly sane :) There is no sustainable reason to lug around
some other project's code in yours in the Open Source world.
Right now we
--On 21. März 2008 13:39:08 -0700 Timothy Selivanow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 20:09 +0100, Andreas Jung wrote:
Hi,
speaking as the Zope 2 release manager: I am strongly opposed against
splitting Zope yourself into different packages and modules. With Zope
2 depending
As the subject implies, I'm working on a package for Fedora. I've come
across some missing dependencies, and some that are different versions.
Because of the way that Python packages are put together (shared library
environment), I'm trying to strip out everything that is not Zope
specific (e.g.
Hi,
speaking as the Zope 2 release manager: I am strongly opposed against
splitting Zope
yourself into different packages and modules. With Zope 2 depending from
various Zope 3 packages (roughly 80-90) we have already the situation to
keep track which packages belong together. This will
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 20:09 +0100, Andreas Jung wrote:
Hi,
speaking as the Zope 2 release manager: I am strongly opposed against
splitting Zope yourself into different packages and modules. With Zope
2 depending from various Zope 3 packages (roughly 80-90) we have
already the situation to
Disclaimer: my knowledge is not complete, and my track record of writing
emails late at night is not very good. Take this with a big grain of
salt.
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 11:57:31AM -0700, Timothy Selivanow wrote:
As the subject implies, I'm working on a package for Fedora. I've come
across
10 matches
Mail list logo
