[Zope-dev] Re: [ZODB-Dev] Re: [Zope3-dev] Proposal: Move to subversion for source code control of the Zope and ZODB projects

2004-04-20 Thread Jim Fulton
Chris Withers wrote: Jim Fulton wrote: Lennart Regebro wrote: From: "Jim Fulton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Initially, I propose to move just the repository heads. Maintenamce branches (e.g. Zope 2.6 and Zope 2.7) will remain in CVS. What is the rationale behind not moving it all? - Reduce risk -

[Zope-dev] Re: [ZODB-Dev] Re: [Zope3-dev] Proposal: Move to subversion for source code control of the Zope and ZODB projects

2004-04-20 Thread Chris Withers
Jim Fulton wrote: Lennart Regebro wrote: From: "Jim Fulton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Initially, I propose to move just the repository heads. Maintenamce branches (e.g. Zope 2.6 and Zope 2.7) will remain in CVS. What is the rationale behind not moving it all? - Reduce risk - Provide a more gradual tr

[Zope-dev] Re: [ZODB-Dev] Re: [Zope3-dev] Proposal: Move to subversion for source code control of the Zope and ZODB projects

2004-04-12 Thread Sidnei da Silva
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 08:11:44AM -0400, Tres Seaver wrote: | Lennart Regebro wrote: | >From: "Jim Fulton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | > | >>Initially, I propose to move just the repository heads. Maintenamce | >>branches (e.g. Zope 2.6 and Zope 2.7) will remain in CVS. | > | >What is the rationale behi

[Zope-dev] Re: [ZODB-Dev] Re: [Zope3-dev] Proposal: Move to subversion for source code control of the Zope and ZODB projects

2004-04-12 Thread Andreas Jung
--On Montag, 12. April 2004 13:07 Uhr +0200 Lennart Regebro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: "Jim Fulton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Initially, I propose to move just the repository heads. Maintenamce branches (e.g. Zope 2.6 and Zope 2.7) will remain in CVS. What is the rationale behind not moving it