On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 08:11:44AM -0400, Tres Seaver wrote: | Lennart Regebro wrote: | >From: "Jim Fulton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | > | >>Initially, I propose to move just the repository heads. Maintenamce | >>branches (e.g. Zope 2.6 and Zope 2.7) will remain in CVS. | > | >What is the rationale behind not moving it all? | | Risk mitigation; we have significant support requirements for deployed | systems built around CVS for both 2.6- and 2.7-based sites, whereas the | head and Zope3 have no such inertia. We don't know enough about the | migration process to have any confidence that existing history / | branches, etc., won't be somehow messed up, which makes it prudent to | plan the migration around the already-unstable bits.
Just FYI, Kapil has been doing a good job at improving the script that migrates from CVS to SVN, and we are ready to flip the switch to move Plone, Collective and possibly Archetypes to SVN. -- Sidnei da Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://awkly.org - dreamcatching :: making your dreams come true http://plone.org/about/team#dreamcatcher Real computer scientists like having a computer on their desk, else how could they read their mail? _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
