On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 08:11:44AM -0400, Tres Seaver wrote:
| Lennart Regebro wrote:
| >From: "Jim Fulton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| >
| >>Initially, I propose to move just the repository heads. Maintenamce
| >>branches (e.g. Zope 2.6 and Zope 2.7) will remain in CVS.
| >
| >What is the rationale behind not moving it all?
| 
| Risk mitigation;  we have significant support requirements for deployed 
| systems built around CVS for both 2.6- and 2.7-based sites, whereas the 
| head and Zope3 have no such inertia.  We don't know enough about the 
| migration process to have any confidence that existing history / 
| branches, etc., won't be somehow messed up, which makes it prudent to 
| plan the migration around the already-unstable bits.

Just FYI, Kapil has been doing a good job at improving the script that
migrates from CVS to SVN, and we are ready to flip the switch to move
Plone, Collective and possibly Archetypes to SVN.

-- 
Sidnei da Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://awkly.org - dreamcatching :: making your dreams come true
http://plone.org/about/team#dreamcatcher

Real computer scientists like having a computer on their desk, else how
could they read their mail?

_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to